Angola
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Summary
Signatory Angola has pledged to ratify the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but its ratification has yet to be presented to parliament for consideration and approval. Angola has participated in all of the convention’s meetings. It has voted in favor of the annual United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution promoting the convention since 2015.
Angola stated in September 2017 that it does not possess any stocks of cluster munitions and commented on past use. Angola is not known to have produced or exported cluster munitions.
Policy
The Republic of Angola signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008.
For more than a decade, Angolan representatives have promised that the government will ratify the convention, but the ratification request has not yet been presented to parliament for consideration and approval.[1] Angola last provided an update on its ratification status in 2017.
Existing legislation, such as the constitution and Penal Code, ensures Angola’s implementation of the convention’s provisions. In September 2017, Angola stated that it regards existing laws and regulations as “sufficient to charge, prosecute and punish any national or foreign citizen who in the Angolan Territory develop, produce, acquire, stockpile, retain or transfer to anyone directly or indirectly, assist, encourage or induce anyone to engage in any activity prohibited under the Convention of Cluster Munitions.”[2]
Angola has not submitted a voluntary Article 7 transparency report detailing the actions it is taking to implement and adhere to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[3]
Angola participated extensively in the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It did not attend the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008, but signed the convention in Oslo in December 2008.[4]
Angola participated in the convention’s Second Review Conference in November 2020 and September 2021, as well as intersessional meetings held in May 2022. It has attended every Meeting of States Parties of the convention, as well as its First Review Conference in 2015. Angola has participated in regional workshops on the convention, most recently in Abuja, Nigeria in March 2022.[5]
In December 2021, Angola voted in favor of a UNGA resolution that urged states outside the Convention on Cluster Munitions to “join as soon as possible.”[6] Algeria has not condemned use of cluster munitions in Ukraine or other recent conflicts.
Angola is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW).
Production, transfer, and stockpiling
Angola is not known to have produced or exported cluster munitions.
In September 2017, Angola told States Parties that it does not possess any cluster munitions as its stockpile was destroyed by 2012. It said that disposal teams from the Angolan Armed Forces and the HALO Trust destroyed a total of 7,284 submunitions from stocks in 2005–2012.[7] According to Angola’s statement, officials from the highest ranks of the Angolan Army and Ministry of Defense confirmed the country no longer possesses cluster munitions.
Angola still must provide a transparency report for the convention to formally confirm that all its cluster munition stocks have been destroyed.
According to a major arms reference publication, Angola purchased four 220mm Uragan multi-barrel rocket launchers from Belarus in 2018.[8] The Uragan launcher can fire different types of rockets including those with 9N210 and 9N235 explosive submunitions. Angola must declare whether it acquired 9M27K-series cluster munition rockets as part of this purchase.
Use
Deminers have cleared unexploded submunitions and other remnants of air-delivered cluster munitions from at least eight of Angola’s 18 provinces, mostly in the south and southeast.[9] However, a lack of firm evidence means that it is not possible to conclusively attribute exact responsibility for the past use of cluster munitions during fighting between government forces and National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (União Nacional para a Independência Total, UNITA) rebels from 1975–2000.
In 2017, Angola told States Parties that there was “very limited” information about past use, but said cluster munitions were used after the country became independent in November 1975 and that “the racist regime in South Africa with heavy air force and artillery … carried [sic] out a series of attacks to the southern and southeastern provinces of Angola to prevent the independence, with the excuses of following the freedom fighter of SWAPO and ANC [independence movements for Namibia and South Africa respectively] inside Angola and also to stop the government forces attacking the rebels movement UNITA supported by USA.”[10]
Angola stated that its territory “became a cold war battlefield, with the Angolan government forces supported also by Soviet Union and Cuba.” Its 2017 statement added that “The war planes from South Africa Air Force were used on a daily base [sic] to strike government forces, SWAPO and ANC positions and other areas of the country indiscriminately. In that period, the Angolan Air Force also attacked UNITA positions to retaliate their extemporaneous ground attacks. This was the time when Clusters Munitions were used in Angola.”
The types of cluster munitions cleared by deminers in Angola include Soviet-made RBK 250-series cluster bombs.[11] In 2016, the HALO Trust cleared two Alpha submunitions during survey operations in Cunene province along with the remnants of CB470 cluster bombs. In September 2017, Angola said the Alpha bomblet was developed in Rhodesia in 1970 and later in South Africa in the 1980s.[12]
[1] In June 2016, representatives from Angola’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Defense said the ratification process was at a “very advanced stage.” See, Michael P. Moore, “It’s time for Angola to ratify the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” CMC website. In August 2016, Angolan officials predicted that the ratification process would be completed within two months. ICBL-CMC meeting with Fernando Pedro Marques, Third Secretary, Angolan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Addis Ababa, 4–5 August 2016. See also, statement of Angola, Convention on Cluster Munitions Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 September 2017.
[2] Statement of Angola, Convention on Cluster Munitions Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 September 2017.
[3] However, in 2017, Angola shared an informal summary draft report for the period 2009–2016. Statement of Angola, Convention on Cluster Munitions Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 September 2017.
[4] For details on Angola’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), p. 29.
[5] Convention on Cluster Munitions Implementation Support Unit (ISU), Report on the African Regional Convention on Cluster Munitions Universalization Workshop in Abuja, Nigeria, 23–24 March 2022.
[6] “Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 76/47, 6 December 2021. Angola has voted in favor of previous UNGA resolutions promoting the convention since 2016, after being absent from the vote on the first resolution in 2015.
[7] Previously, in 2010, an official said that the Angolan Armed Forces no longer possesses cluster munition stocks following a project by the government and the HALO Trust to destroy Angola’s stockpile. CMC meetings with Maria Madalena Neto, Victim Assistance Coordinator, National Intersectoral Commission for Demining and Humanitarian Assistance (Comissão Nacional Intersectorial de Desminagem e Assistência Humanitária, CNIDAH), International Conference on the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Santiago, 7–9 June 2010. Notes by the CMC and Human Rights Watch (HRW).
[8] Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Arms Transfers Database, Angola, “Transfers of major weapons: Deals with deliveries or orders made for 2010 to 2020,” generated 15 June 2021.
[9] In September 2017, Angola stated that eight provinces were suspected to be contaminated with cluster munition remnants: Bengo, Bié, Cunene, Huambo, Huila, Kuando Kubango, Kuanza Sul, and Moxico. Statement of Angola, Convention on Cluster Munitions Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 September 2017.
[10] Statement of Angola, Convention on Cluster Munitions Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 September 2017.
[11] Landmine Action, “Note on Cluster Munitions in Angola,” 10 February 2004. In the past, Jane’s Information Group noted that KMGU dispensers that deploy submunitions were in service for Angolan Air Force aircraft. Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey: Jane’s Information Group, 2004), p. 835.
[12] Statement of Angola, Convention on Cluster Munitions Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 September 2017.
Impact
Jump to a specific section of the chapter:
Treaty Status | Management & Coordination | Impact (contamination & casualties) | Addressing the Impact (land release, risk education, victim assistance)
Country summary
The Republic of Angola is contaminated with landmines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) as a result of four decades of armed conflict, which ended in 2002.
Angola became a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty on 1 January 2003, but has not yet enacted national legislation to implement the treaty. Angola has acknowledged using antipersonnel mines between December 1997 and April 2002.
Mine clearance in Angola began in 1994 during a United Nations (UN) verification mission. A Landmine Impact Survey was completed in 2005, and non-technical survey was conducted prior to Angola’s 2017 Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 extension request. In 2019, Angola completed non-technical survey in all 18 provinces, enabling a significant amount of uncontaminated land to be released and providing a clearer understanding of the extent of contamination.[1]
Angola has requested two extensions to its Article 5 clearance deadline: a five-year extension until January 2018, and an extension for a further eight years until December 2025. Angola reports that funding shortfalls are the most significant challenge to meeting this deadline.[2]
Risk education is conducted by operators as an integrated part of survey, clearance and explosive ordnance disposal (EOD), but is not integrated into the school curriculum.
Angola has an estimated 60,000–88,000 mine/ERW victims, but it is thought that the true number may be higher as there is no national casualty surveillance system, and many casualties likely go unreported. Investment to rebuild infrastructure and increase access to medical facilities has been undertaken. The Presidential Plan for Physical Rehabilitation was launched in 2013 to increase the availability of physical rehabilitation services, provide materials to rehabilitation centers, and improve the national referral system.[3] A victim survey was partially carried out that same year, but stalled.
By 2015, an economic crisis had reduced government funding for victim assistance, and as a result, there has been a near shutdown of victim assistance programs, with public rehabilitation centers unable to produce new prosthetics and little time-bound reporting on service provision.
Treaty status overview
Mine Ban Treaty |
State Party Article 5 clearance deadline (second extension): 31 December 2025 |
Convention on Cluster Munitions |
Signatory |
Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) |
State Party |
Angola became a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty on 1 January 2003 and has since submitted two Article 5 deadline extension requests for clearance. Its current Article 5 deadline for clearance of antipersonnel mines is 31 December 2025.[4]
Mine action management and coordination
Mine action management and coordination overview[5]
Mine action commenced |
1994 |
National mine action management actors |
National Intersectoral Commission for Demining and Humanitarian Assistance (Comissão Nacional Intersectorial de Desminagem e Assistência Humanitária, CNIDAH)
Executive Commission for Demining (Comissão Executiva de Desminagem, CED) |
UN agencies |
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), since 2002 |
Mine action strategic and operational plans |
National Mine Action Strategy 2020–2025 National Demining Workplan 2020–2025 |
Mine action legislation |
No specific legislation |
Mine action standards |
National Mine Action Standards |
Coordination
The National Intersectoral Commission for Demining and Humanitarian Assistance (Comissão Nacional Intersectorial de Desminagem e Assistência Humanitária, CNIDAH) is mandated to coordinate and oversee the mine action sector in Angola.[6] It reports to the Council of Ministers and is responsible for accreditation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and commercial demining companies. CNIDAH has 18 provincial operations offices.
The Executive Commission for Demining (Comissão Executiva de Desminagem, CED), under the supervision of CNIDAH, is responsible for monitoring and controlling the activities of the national mine action operators (Angolan Armed Forces, Military Office of the President, National Institute for Demining, and Police Border Guard).[7] Government financial contributions to CED are mainly to support demining for infrastructure and verification, and for clearance of contaminated roads.[8]
The National Institute for Demining (Instituto Nacional de Desminagem, INAD), established in 2002, is responsible for demining operations and training in Angola.
Strategies and policy
Angola has a five-year National Mine Action Strategy in place for 2020–2025, aligned to the Oslo Action Plan. The strategy covers land release, residual contamination management, risk education, victim assistance, advocacy, and communication and coordination.[9] Development of the strategy was supported by the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD).[10]
A National Demining Workplan, covering 2020–2025, was developed to support implementation of the National Mine Action Strategy over the same period.
Information management
Angola’s mine action program has previously experienced difficulties in information management, but in 2016, Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) Next Generation was installed, with support from GICHD. Angola’s national database has been fully reconciled and the previous data backlog cleared.[11] INAD is responsible for the IMSMA database, and efforts have been made to harmonize CED data with the CNIDAH database.
Gender and diversity
Gender and diversity are mentioned as cross-cutting issues in the National Mine Action Strategy 2020–2025, but are not included in Angola’s Article 5 implementation workplan. Angola signed the Working Paper on Gender Equality at the Oslo Review Conference in November 2019.[12]
In 2017, The HALO Trust launched the “100 Women in Demining” project in Angola, to train and employ all-female demining teams to create a space for women’s employment. In 2020, 76 women had been recruited, with six promoted to leadership training, and 33 having completed paramedic training.[13]
Risk education management and coordination
Risk education management and coordination overview[14]
Government focal points |
CNIDAH |
Coordination mechanisms |
No formal coordination mechanism for risk education |
Risk education standards |
National Mine Action Standards have been submitted, and are pending approval from the Council of Ministers |
Coordination
CNIDAH oversees risk education activities in Angola, and monitors and approves risk education methods, but there is no formal risk education coordination mechanism at national level. However, regular meetings are held between CNIDAH and international mine action operators in Angola.[15]
Monthly meetings are attended by Mines Advisory Group (MAG), Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) and The HALO Trust, who undertake risk education activities in Angola under a contract issued by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID).[16]
Victim assistance management and coordination
Victim assistance management and coordination overview[17]
Government focal points |
Department of Mine Victim Assistance, CNIDAH |
Coordination mechanisms |
Biannual inter-ministerial and inter-agency meetings, quarterly provincial and municipal meetings, remote communication |
Plans/strategies |
National Integrated Plan for Mine Victim Assistance, 2013–2017, has expired New “Mine Victim Assistance Guidelines” have been drafted, but their distribution is unclear. Angola’sNational Mine Action Strategy for 2020–2025, is reported to include victim assistance elements, but details were not provided |
Disability sector integration
|
Mine victim assistance is classified as an independent activity and funding is sought separate to other disability assistance, although disabled persons’ organizations are involved |
Survivor inclusion and participation |
CNIDAH includes representatives of national NGOs and the Angolan Federation of the Association of People with Disabilities (Federação Angolana das Associações das Pessoas Com Deficiência, FAPED) in coordination meetings |
Note: NGO=non-governmental organization.
Laws and policies
In July 2019, the Angolan government was considering doubling the pension for soldiers from the 1975–2002 Angolan Civil War, along with providing free transport and greater access to schools and health facilities. Yet, many of those eligible for pensions were not receiving them.[18]
Contamination
Contamination (as of December 2019)[19]
Landmines |
88.02km² (CHA: 84.79km² and SHA: 3.23km2) Extent of contamination: Large |
Antivehicle Mines |
2.39km² (CHA: 2.31km² and SHA: 0.08km²) |
Cluster munition remnants |
Extent not known, but low contamination |
Other ERW |
Extent of contamination: Large |
Note: CHA=confirmed hazardous area; SHA=suspected hazardous area; ERW=explosive remnant of war.
Landmine contamination
Angola’s contamination is the result of more than 40 years of internal armed conflict that ended in 2002, during which a range of national and foreign armed movements and groups laid mines, often sporadically. The most affected provinces are those that witnessed the fiercest and most prolonged fighting, such as Bié, Kuando Kubango, and Moxico. Contamination affects urban and rural areas.
CNIDAH reported in 2017 that the continued presence of landmines remains a serious impediment to development projects related to economic diversification, agriculture, tourism, and mining.[20]
Cluster munition remnants contamination
The extent to which Angola is affected by cluster munition remnants remains unclear. There is no confirmed contamination, although abandoned cluster munitions or unexploded submunitions may be present as a result of the armed conflict that ended in 2002. However, it is unclear when, or by whom, cluster munitions were used in Angola.
ERW contamination
Angola also has a significant problem with contamination by other types of ERW, which in some areas of the country may pose more of a threat to communities than landmines.[21]
Casualties
Casualties overview[22]
Casualties |
|
All known casualties (2008–2019) |
Estimated 60,000–88,000 |
Casualties in 2019 |
|
Annual total |
76 (an increase from 30 casualties in 2018) |
Survival outcome |
26 killed, 34 injured, 16 unknown |
Device type causing casualties |
11 antivehicle mines, 1 ERW, 64 unknown |
Civilian status |
All casualties in 2019 were civilians |
Age and gender |
27 adults (gender unknown) 49 children (1 boy, 48 unknown) |
Note: ERW=explosive remnant of war.
Casualties: details
There is no national casualty surveillance or data collection system in Angola. Casualties increased significantly from 30 in 2018, to 76 in 2019. Available data on casualties was obtained from media reports, and most did not specify the device type, resulting in most casualties (64) reported as from undifferentiated mines/ERW. Antivehicle mines caused at least 11 of reported casualties in 2019.
According to Angola’s Minister of Social Action, Family and Women’s Promotion, from January 2017 to June 2019, 156 people were killed, including 87 children, in 70 separate incidents.[23]
MAG reported that in the three provinces where it works—Lunda Norte, Lunda Sul, and Moxico—incidents likely go unreported due to lack of communication and reporting systems.[24] In 2015, The HALO Trust also noted that “anecdotally, the heavy toll of landmines in Angola is well known. However, at national and provincial levels, Angola has always lacked an effective mechanism for systematic recording of accident data and as a result, its impact is underestimated.”[25]
The HALO Trust conducted a desk review of all mine/ERW incidents in Angola from 1975–2015, combining media reports with its own records. In 2016 and 2017, its findings were updated based on the re-survey of mined areas. As of 31 March 2017, The HALO Trust identified 1,651 casualties from 815 mine/ERW incidents across nine provinces.[26] While not representative of all casualties in those provinces over the time period, the review indicated that antivehicle mines were the most common cause of injury, and that the fatality rate from incidents involving explosive devices was higher than previously believed. The review also indicated that 2002 and 2003 witnessed the most mine/ERW casualties, when Angolans returned to their homes after the end of the civil war.[27]
As of the end of 2014, CNIDAH had registered 9,165 survivors across the provinces of Benguela, Cabinda, Cunene, Huambo, Huíla, Malanje, Namibe, Uíge, and Zaire, as part of its national mine/ERW victim survey.[28] The survey was suspended due to a lack of funds. CNIDAH estimated that the total number of injured mine/ERW casualties might be between 40,000 and 60,000.[29] Angola had previously estimated that there were some 80,000 mine survivors in Angola, representing 78% of all persons with disabilities.[30]
The Angolan government conducted a nationwide census in 2014, which found that 88,716 people were living with a disability caused by mines/ERW. Survivors were identified in all 18 provinces, with one quarter living in Luanda. Mine/ERW survivors represented one eighth all disabled people in Angola, with 2.5% of the population identified in the survey as having disabilities. Approximately two-thirds of survivors were concentrated in Luanda, with others found in the mine-affected provinces of Bié, Huambo, Malange, and Moxico.[31]
Cluster munition remnants casualties
No casualties from cluster munition remnants were reported in Angola in 2019, and the number of unexploded submunition casualties in the country is unclear.
CNIDAH’s national victim survey identified 354 cluster munition survivors, all in the province of Huambo.[32] In 2014 and 2015, Monitor reports included these figures. Subsequent information has not reconfirmed this data and calls this total into question. The survey in Huambo was conducted by the Institute for the Support of Vulnerable Children (Instituto ao Apoio a crianca Vulneravel, IACV), which is not a mine action operator, and the survey questionnaire used by IACV did not include the category of cluster munitions as a specific cause of injury.[33] In 2015, The HALO Trust conducted a desk review of all known incidents from 1975–2015, limited to its areas of operation, which include Huambo province. The review did not identify any cluster munition victims.[34] NPA compiled a desk review on potential cluster munition contamination in Angola but did not record any casualties. However, in the course of the review, NPA was able to document the clearance and identification of unexploded cluster submunitions.[35]
Mine action
Operators and service providers
Clearance operators
National |
|
International |
|
Clearance
Land release overview[36]
Landmine clearance 2019 |
Cleared: 1.92km² Reduced: 0.75km² Cancelled: 11.19km² Total land released: 13.86km² |
Total ordnance destroyed 2019 |
Antipersonnel mines:1,943 Antivehicle mines: 96 ERW: 8,081 |
Landmine clearance 2015–2019 |
2015: 4.1km² 2016: 1.2km² 2017: 1.2km² 2018: 1.04km² 2019: 1.92km² Total land cleared: 9.46km² |
Cluster munition remnants clearance 2019 |
No land clearance, but 164 submunitions found and destroyed |
Note: ERW=explosive remnant of war.
Clearance and survey
At the time of Angola’s 2017 Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 extension request, 221.4km² of land was identified as contaminated, of which 149.51km² was classed as confirmed hazardous areas (CHA).
This has been reduced through non-technical survey. As of the end of 2019, Angola had 88.02km² of contaminated land remaining, comprising 84.79km² of CHA and 3.23km² suspected hazardous area (SHA).[37] At the Eighteenth Meeting of State Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty, held in November 2020, Angola reported that 1,143 minefields remained, comprising 84km² in total.[38] The provinces of Huambo, Melange, and Namibe are reported to be nearing completion of clearance.[39]
Angola cleared 1.92km² of mine contaminated land in 2019, an increase from 1.04km² in 2018.
The main challenge to meeting its Article 5 deadline of 2025 is a funding shortfall. Following oil boom in 2010, Angola achieved upper-middle income status, and donor funding for mine action later decreased from US$32.1 million in 2014 to US$3.1 million in 2017.[40] The Angolan government budget for 2019 allocated US$15 million for clearance, with US$4.7 million allocated to CED for demining areas where mines/ERW have high social and economic impact.[41] However, Angola identified a budget deficit of US$211 million to clear its remaining contamination.[42]
In 2019, Angola reported that mine clearance was being funded through various sources, including traditional donors (see Angola’s support for mine action profile for more information), and oil and gas companies such as British Petroleum and ENI, securing US$66 million in total.[43]
The Angolan government has committed US$60 million, over five years, for the clearance of an area of special natural significance in the south of the country, with a view to the development of a sustainable, community-focused ecotourism project. The HALO Trust is set to begin clearance in the Okavango Delta region as part of this project.[44]
In 2019, no land contaminated with cluster munitions in Angola was reported to have been cleared, but 164 submunitions were found and destroyed through EOD callouts.[45]
Residual contamination
Angola reported that it was planning for the establishment of a rapid response capacity, to respond to any future residual contamination once clearance had been completed. CNIDAH prioritized the formulation of a national residual contamination management strategy in 2020.[46]
Risk Education
Operators and service providers
Risk education operators[47]
Type of organization |
Name of organization |
Type of activity |
Government |
CNIDAH |
Planning, oversight, and monitoring of risk education |
INAD |
Risk education activities |
|
International |
The HALO Trust |
Risk education conducted by roaming teams, operating in conjunction with clearance, survey and EOD tasks |
MAG |
Risk education, including as part of clearance and EOD operations. Risk education for IDPs and refugees in Lunda Norte in 2017–2018 |
|
NPA |
Risk education integrated with land release operations |
Note: EOD=explosive ordnance disposal; IDP=internally displaced persons.
Beneficiary numbers
Beneficiary numbers
Operator |
Men |
Boys |
Women |
Girls |
MAG |
5,677
|
8,766 |
6,265 |
8,835
|
The HALO Trust |
2,367 |
6,404 |
3,533 |
6,018 |
Implementation
Risk education activities in Angola are conducted in urban, peri-urban and rural areas, and focus mainly on the threat from landmines, antivehicle mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO).
Risk education activities are conducted as stand-alone activities, but more commonly as part of clearance and EOD tasks. CNIDAH reports that risk education is implemented by all operators during their clearance operations. Operators collect information on suspected areas and landmine victims.[48]
Risk education in Angola is mainly delivered through face-to-face community sessions, which are held in a variety of locations including marketplaces, schools, churches, and households. This is the primary method of communication because those most at risk tend to live in rural areas, where access to other means of delivery is limited.[49] Risk education is not integrated into the primary or secondary school curriculums in Angola.[50]
During 2017–2018, MAG provided risk education in camps, reception areas and host communities for refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs), and to international NGO staff and Angolan officials responding to the displacement crisis in Lunda Norte province.[51]
MAG also works with Radio Moxico to broadcast risk education information in six different local languages. The radio station has a catchment audience of around 500,000 people.[52]
Challenges for delivery of risk education in Angola include the large size of the areas covered by operators, and limited access among the population to media, including TV, radio and internet.[53]
Target groups
Data is available to target risk education, but victim data is under-reported. Operators collect data and coordinate with CNIDAH operations rooms and provincial police and hospitals to support the provision of risk education.[54] Victim data, when available, is also sent to CNIDAH at the national level for incorporation into its database.[55]
Target groups for risk education in Angola include farmers, hunters, gatherers, animal herders, informal workers, churchgoers, market traders, travelers and children. Children are considered to be at higher risk of mine/ERW incidents due to lack of knowledge about the war and its impacts.
New developments in 2019–2020
In April–May 2020, MAG adapted its risk education radio messages to focus on people returning to work after the COVID-19 lockdown, providing information on how report explosive ordnance.[56]
In 2020, MAG also employed a new female risk education staff member, specializing in provision of risk education in schools and to share her experiences as a landmine victim.
In 2019, the Government of Angola, through the National Demining Institute (NDI) and CNIDAH, implemented risk education projects in the province of Kwanza Sul, mainly targeting children.
Victim Assistance
Providers and activities
Victim assistance providers
Type of organization |
Name of organization |
Type of activity |
Governmental |
Neves Bendinha Orthopedic Center (Centro Ortopédico Neves Bendinha) |
Physiotherapy |
Ministry for Assistance and Social Reintegration (Ministério da Assistência e Reinserção Social, MINARS) |
Referrals for mobility devices, vocational training, income-generating projects, provision of subsistence items |
|
National Council for Social Action (CNACS) |
Advocacy and coordination |
|
Department of Mine Victim Assistance, CNIDAH |
Reporting and needs assessment |
|
National |
National Association of the Disabled of Angola(Associação Nacional dos deficientes de Angola, ANDA) |
Community-based rehabilitation, advocacy and survivor representation |
Fundacion Lwini |
Physiotherapy, prosthetics |
Needs assessment
CNIDAH aims to complete its needs assessment of mine survivors, and lists this as a main victim assistance priority.[57] As of the end of 2019, 9,296 victims have been assessed in nine provinces, but funds are lacking to complete the assessment or act upon the assessments already made.[58]
The CNIDAH Department of Mine Victim Assistance registration project, which documented the needs of individual survivors, has been suspended since 2014 due to lack of funding.[59] Some data is being collected, as evidenced by the casualty figures, but the consistency of reporting is unclear.
Medical care and rehabilitation
Few public rehabilitation centers in Angola are able to produce new prosthetic or mobility devices. Rehabilitation services are available via public clinics, such a Neves Bendinha Orthopedic Centre in Luanda province, but reporting on beneficiary numbers is very limited.[60] Angola’s rehabilitation programs are limited to physical rehabilitation and the repair of existing prosthetic devices, due to a lack of raw materials. Lwini Foundation, a privately-run and privately-funded group, continued to produce devices in 2019.[61] However, in 2020, it was reported that construction of a new facility for the Lwini Foundation in Angola had stalled due to a lack of funding.[62]
Socio-economic and psychosocial inclusion
The National Association of the Disabled of Angola (Associação Nacional dos deficientes de Angola, ANDA) leads a community-based rehabilitation program titled ‘‘Come with me,’’ which provides training and outreach in the provinces of Malange, Huila, Bié, Moxico, Cabinda, Uige and Cuanza Sul. The uncertain economic situation in Angola limits the effectiveness of economic reintegration activities for mine victims.[63] Angola reported that inclusive and special education, as well as computer literacy and braille, were among its priorities with regard to victim assistance.[64]
[1] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form J, p. 10.
[2] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Second Article 5 deadline Extension Request (revised), 14 November 2017, p. 5.
[3] Interview with Maria Madalena Neto, CNIDAH, in Geneva, 28 May 2013.
[4] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Second Article 5 deadline Extension Request (revised), 14 November 2017, p. 3.
[5] In relation to mine action legislation, Angola notes that “the existing pieces of legislation in the main legal and judicial system of Angola (National Constitution, Penal Code, Civil Code, Family Code, Working Law and others) are sufficient to charge, prosecute and punish any national or foreign citizen who uses, produces, transfers, stores or encourages others to use antipersonnel mines within Angolan territory.” Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2018), Form A, p. 2.
[6] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form J, p. 11.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Ibid., p. 10.
[10] GICHD, “Annual Report 2019,” 8 June 2020, p. 20.
[11] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form J, p. 11.
[12] Ibid., p. 12.
[13] HALO Trust, “Annual Report and Financial Statements,” 31 March 2019, p. 6; and HALO Trust, “100 Women in Demining in Angola,” undated.
[14] Information on National Mine Action Standards obtained in response to Monitor questionnaire by Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, Mines Advisory Group (MAG), 13 May 2020.
[15] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, MAG, 13 May 2020.
[16] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Carlota Moura, Programme Officer, HALO Trust, 23 April 2020.
[17] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form J.
[18] Vermaak Maryke and Daniel Pensador, “Long after Angola's civil war, its veterans are destitute,” Agence France Press (AFP), 5 July 2019.
[19] See, Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form C, p. 3.
[20] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Second Article 5 Extension Request (revised), 14 November 2017, p. 19.
[21] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, MAG, 13 May 2020.
[22] Data obtained in interview with Adriano Goncalves, Head of International Relations, CNIDAH, in Geneva, 8 June 2018. Data for 2019 also obtained via Monitor media scanning for calendar year 2019; email from Jennifer Dathan, Researcher, Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), 5 October 2020; and Monitor analysis of Armed Conflict Location and Event Data project (ACLED) data for calendar year 2019. See, Clionadh Raleigh, Andrew Linke, Håvard Hegre, and Joakim Karlsen, “Introducing ACLED-Armed Conflict Location and Event Data,” Journal of Peace Research, Issue 47, Vol. 5, September 2010, pp. 651–660.
[23] “At least 108 thousand kilometres of roads cleared of landmines,” Angola Press Agency, 17 August 2019.
[24] Email from Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, MAG, 8 February 2018.
[25] HALO Trust, “Mine/ERW Accident Report: Angola 1975–2015; Benguela, Bié, Huambo, Huila, Kuando Kubango and Kwanza Sul,” undated.
[26] Email from Gerhard Zank, HALO Trust, 23 April 2017. See also, HALO Trust, “Angola ERW Accident Report: 1975–2015; Bie, Benguela, Huambo, Huila, Kuando Kubango and Kwanza Sul,” undated. The nine provinces where casualties have been reported are Bie, Bengo, Benguela, Cunene, Huambo, Huila, Kuando Kubango, Namibe, and Kwanza Sul.
[27] HALO Trust, “Angola ERW Accident Report: 1975–2015; Bie, Benguela, Huambo, Huila, Kuando Kubango and Kwanza Sul,” undated.
[28] There were nine provinces still to be surveyed as of the end of 2014, when funds for the survey ended. See, CNIDAH, “Relatório Anual do ‘Projecto Nacional de Recolha e Actualização de Dados sobre as Pessoas com deficiência Vítima de Minas’ – 2014” (“Annual Report of ‘National Project to Collect and Update Data regarding Persons with Disabilities, Mine Victims’ – 2014”), undated.
[29] Interview with Adriano Goncalves, CNIDAH, in Geneva, 8 June 2018.
[30] Angola has stated this figure on several occasions. For example, see, statement of Angola, Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 20 September 2006; and US Department of State, “2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Angola,” Washington, DC, 8 April 2011. For this and other estimates of casualty totals, see previous Monitor victim assistance profiles.
[31] National Institute of Statistics (INE), “Resultados Definitivos Recenseamento Geral da Populacao e Habitacao – 2014” (“Final results General Population and Housing Census – 2014”), 28 March 2016. Quadro 8 - População portadora de deficiência por província e área de residência, segundo as causas da deficiência e sexo (Table 8 – Disabled population by province and area or residence, accoding to the cause of disability and sex).
[32] Email from Nsimba Paxe, CNIDAH, Luanda, 3 April 2013. Angola also reported 1,497 cluster munition remnants victims in Huambo via the same survey. Statement of Angola, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 9–13 September 2013.
[33] Interview with Nsimba Paxe, CNIDAH, Luanda, 27 June 2016.
[34] HALO Trust, “Angola ERW Accident Report: 1975–2015; Bie, Benguela, Huambo, Huila, Kuando Kubango and Kwanza Sul,” undated.
[35] Mario Nunes, NPA, “Cluster Munitions Remnants: Desk Assessment Report,” 5 February 2016.
[36] See, Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form F, p. 7; and email from Robert Iga Afedra, Capacity Development Advisor, CNIDAH, 12 August 2020.
[37] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form C, p. 3.
[38] Statement of Angola, Mine Ban Treaty Eighteenth Meeting of State Parties (virtual), 16–20 November 2020.
[39] Ibid.
[40] GICHD, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), and King’s College London (KCL), “The Socio-economic Impact of anti-vehicle mines in Angola,” 12 November 2019, p. 25. For support for mine action data, see ICBL, “Country Profile: Angola: Support for Mine Action,” 16 November 2020.
[41] GICHD, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), and King’s College London (KCL), “The Socio-economic Impact of anti-vehicle mines in Angola,” 12 November 2019, p. 25.
[42] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form J, p. 10.
[43] Ibid., p. 11.
[44] Statement of Angola, Mine Ban Treaty Eighteenth Meeting of State Parties (virtual), 16–20 November 2020.
[45] Email from Robert Iga Afedra, Capacity Development Advisor, CNIDAH, 12 August 2020.
[46] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form J, p. 10; and Statement of Angola, Mine Ban Treaty Eighteenth Meeting of State Parties (virtual), 16–20 November 2020.
[47] See, CNIDAH, “Planning and Programming,” undated; response to Monitor questionnaire by Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, MAG, 13 May 2020; and email from Rasmus Sandvoll Weschke, Advisor, Conflict Preparedness and Protection, NPA, 5 June 2020.
[48] Angola Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2019), Form I, p. 9.
[49] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Carlota Moura, Programme Officer, HALO Trust, 23 April 2020.
[50] Ibid.; and by Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, MAG, 13 May 2020.
[51] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Jeanette Dijkstra, Country Director, MAG, 13 May 2020.
[52] Ibid.
[53] Ibid., and by Carlota Moura, Programme Officer, HALO Trust, 23 April 2020.
[54] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, MAG, 13 May 2020.
[55] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Carlota Moura, Programme Officer, HALO Trust, 23 April 2020.
[56] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Jeanette Dijkstra, Angola Country Director, MAG, 13 May 2020.
[57] Statement of Angola, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 28 November 2020.
[58] Statement of Angola, Global Conference on Assistance to Victims of Anti-Personnel Mines and Other Explosive Remnants of War and Disability Rights, Amman, 10 September 2019.
[59] Ibid.
[60] Madalena Neto, Head of Mine Victim Assistance, CNIDAH, “Victim Assistance in Angola,” presentation to the Mine Ban Treaty Seventeenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 26–29 November 2018.
[61] Lwini Foundation, “20 Anos de Solidariedade” (‘‘20 Years of Solidarity”), 22 January 2019, pp. 14 and 24.
[62] Teresa Fukiady, “Liwini, A lack of Money paralyzes works of the former First Lady's Foundation,” Novo Journal, 9 November 2020.
[63] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Enoque Bernardo, ANDA, 4 June 2018.
[64] Statement of Angola, Mine Ban Treaty Fourth Review Conference, Oslo, 28 November 2020.
Mine Ban Policy
Policy
The Republic of Angola signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 4 December 1997 and ratified on 5 July 2002, becoming a State Party on 1 January 2003. Angola has not formally reported any legal measures to implement the Mine Ban Treaty.[1] Under Article 13 of Angola’s constitution, any international law approved and ratified by Angola is an integrated part of Angolan law and automatically enters into force at the national level after its publication and entry into force at the international level.[2]
Angola regularly attends meetings of the treaty, most recently the Seventeenth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in November 2018, where it provided a general statement with particular emphasis on clearance progress.[3] Angola also attended the Third Review Conference in Maputo in June 2014. It did not attend the intersessional meetings in Geneva in May 2019.
Angola hosted a National Mine Action Summit in Luanda on 9–10 August 2010. In August 2011, the Third National Meeting on Demining was held in Luanda.
Angola is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons. Angola is a signatory state to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
Production, transfer, use, stockpile destruction, and retention
Angola states that it has never manufactured antipersonnel mines.[4] It is not believed to have exported the weapon in the past. There have not been any confirmed instances of use of antipersonnel mines since Angola ratified the Mine Ban Treaty in 2002.[5]
Angola completed destruction of its stockpile of antipersonnel mines on 28 December 2006, just ahead of its 1 January 2007 treaty deadline. It destroyed 81,045 mines between October and December 2006, in addition to 7,072 antipersonnel mines apparently destroyed in 2003.[6]
As of December 2018, Angola retained 1,304 antipersonnel mines for training and research.[7] Angola reported that the mines are used in training courses for detection and clearance techniques.
[1] In its 2010 report, Angola stated, “Apart from the existing ordinary legislations in the country, no other legal measures were taken within the period under consideration.” Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for the period January 2009 to July 2010), Form A.
[2] A new constitution to replace the interim constitution (in effect since the country’s independence in 1975) was approved by the National Assembly of Angola on 21 January 2010 and promulgated by the president on 5 February 2010. The Constitution of Angola, Article 13 (“Direito Internacional”), states: “1. O direito internacional geral ou comum, recebido nos termos da presente Constituição, faz parte integrante da ordem jurídica angolana. 2. Os tratados e acordos internacionais regularmente aprovados ou ratificados vigoram na ordem jurídica angolana após a sua publicação oficial e entrada em vigor na ordem jurídica internacional e enquanto vincularem internacionalmente o Estado angolano” (“1. International law or policy, received pursuant to this Constitution, is an integral part of Angolan law. 2. International treaties and agreements regularly approved or ratified shall become Angolan law after its official publication and international legal entry into force”).
[3] Statement of Angola, Mine Ban Treaty Seventeenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 26 November 2018.
[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for the period April 2006 to March 2007), Form E.
[5] There have been sporadic and unconfirmed reports of new use of antipersonnel and antivehicle mines since the end of the war, with allegations focused on criminal groups. The government acknowledged using antipersonnel mines while it was a signatory to the Mine Ban Treaty, from December 1997 to April 2002, until it signed a peace agreement with the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (União Nacional para a Independência Total de Angola, UNITA). See, Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 121–122.
[6] See, Landmine Monitor Report 2007, pp. 141–143.
[7] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, 2019.
Support for Mine Action
In 2020, the Republic of Angola received US$15.2 million (37% increase compared to 2019) from six donors.[1] As in 2016–2019, Angola did not receive international support for victim assistance in 2020. Instead, all funds were allocated to clearance, and risk education activities.
International contributions: 2020[2]
Donor |
Sector |
Amount (national currency) |
Amount (US$) |
United States |
Clearance |
US$7,000,000 |
7,000,000 |
United Kingdom |
Clearance and risk education |
£3,201,379 |
4,107,049 |
Japan |
Clearance |
¥237,475,800 |
2,224,068 |
Norway |
Clearance |
NOK9,500,000 |
1,007,605 |
Belgium |
Clearance |
€436,653 |
498,221 |
Sweden |
Clearance and risk education |
SEK3,500,000 |
379,745 |
Total |
N/A |
15,216,688 |
Note: N/A=not applicable.
The government of Angola has contributed more than $117 million to its mine action program since 2016, amounting to 74% of its total mine action budget. In 2020, it contributed $6.1 million and received $11.1 million from international donors, resulting in a $21.3 million overall budget.[3]
In 2016–2020, Angola was one of the 20 largest recipients of international mine action funding and received more than $41.3 million over the five-year period. In 2020, international assistance totaled more than $15 million for the first time since 2014.
Summary of contributions: 2016–2020[4]
Year |
National contributions (US$) |
International contributions (US$) |
Total Budget |
2020 |
6,108,149 |
15,216,688 |
21,324,837 |
2019 |
15,700,000 |
11,118,449 |
26,818,449 |
2018 |
26,458,282 |
7,078,286 |
33,536,568 |
2017 |
45,079,260 |
3,127,966 |
48,207,226 |
2016 |
24,497,253 |
4,797,332 |
29,294,585 |
Total |
117,842,944 |
41,338,721 |
159,181,665 |
[1] Belgium Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2020), Form J; Sweden Convention on Cluster Munition Article 7 Report, Form I, April 2021; emails from Charlotte Van Caeneghem, Attaché, Belgium Federal Public Service Foreign Affairs, 23 April 2021; from Ishida Tatsuya, Conventional arms division/ Arms control and disarmament division, Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 31 May 2021; from Camilla Dannevig, Senior Adviser, Section for Humanitarian Affairs, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 23 September 2021; from Erik Pettersson, Senior Programme Manager, Peace and Human Security Unit, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), 28 September 2021; UK Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form I, 29 April 2021; and US Department of State Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement (PM/WRA), “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2021,” 5 April 2021.
[2] Average exchange rate for 2020: €1=US$1.141; £1=US$1.2829; NOK9.4283=US$1; £1=1.2768; SEK9.2167=US$1; ¥106.7754=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 4 January 2021.
[3] Republic of Angola, Ministry of Finance, National Budget 2020 (Dotação Orçamental por Orgão), December 2019. Average exchange rate for 2020: AOA595.867=US$1, Oanda.com, Historical Exchange Rates.
[4] See previous Monitor reports.