Belarus
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Summary
Non-signatory Belarus acknowledges the humanitarian rationale of the Convention on Cluster Munitions but has not taken any steps to accede. It has never participated in a meeting of the convention and has abstained from voting on the annual United Nations (UN) resolution promoting the convention.
Belarus has not produced cluster munitions, nor is it known to have used or exported them. It inherited a stockpile of cluster munitions from the Soviet Union but has not provided information on the types or quantities possessed.
Policy
The Republic of Belarus has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
Belarus rarely comments on its position on joining the convention.[1] After the convention was adopted in 2008, Belarus said it “shares the humanitarian concerns” caused by cluster munitions but objected to the way that the convention was negotiated outside UN auspices.[2]
Belarus did not participate in the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions, and has never participated in a meeting of the convention.[3]
Belarus has abstained from voting on the annual United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution supporting the implementation and universalization of the convention, most recently in December 2021.[4] Belarus has never explained why it abstains when other non-signatories vote for the non-legally binding resolution.
Belarus is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty, and completed the destruction of its stockpiled antipersonnel landmines in 2017.
Belarus is also a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), and in the past has expressed a preference for cluster munitions to be addressed through this framework convention.
Use, production, and transfer
In 2010, Belarus stated, “Our country is not a producer of cluster munitions.”[5] Belarus is not known to have used cluster munitions.
Since 2014–2016 Belarus has developed and produced the Polonez multi-barrel rocket launcher to replace older systems. This launcher is based on the A200 launcher system of Chinese design and reportedly uses a variety of 300mm rockets, including a “fragmentation armour piercing cluster.”[6] According to the database of arms transfers maintained by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Belarus exported six Polonez launchers to Azerbaijan in 2018. These weapons were used during the 2020 conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, but it is not known if cluster munition rockets were fired from these launchers.
Stockpiling
Belarus inherited a stockpile of cluster munitions from the Soviet Union, but it has never provided public information on the types and quantities that it possesses.[7]
According to Jane’s Information Group, the Belarusian Air Force has RBK-500 series cluster bombs.[8] Belarus also possessed Grad 122mm, Uragan 220mm, and Smerch 300mm surface-to-surface rockets, but it is not known if these include versions with cluster munition payload.[9] This uncertainty extends further as Belarus has exported its older Grad (to Angola and Turkmenistan) and Uragan (to Angola) multi-barrel rocket launchers since 2010.[10]
[1] In November 2010, a government representative told the CMC that the convention is “too strict” and not applicable for Belarus as it may threaten its security. CMC meeting with Ivan Grinevich, Counsellor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Belarus, in Geneva, 30 November 2010. Notes by the CMC.
[2] Statement of Belarus, UNGA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, New York, 30 October 2008. Translation provided by email from Tatiana Fedorovich, Permanent Mission of Belarus to the UN in New York, 26 November 2008.
[3] For details on Belarus’s cluster munition policy and practice up to early 2009, see Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 190–191.
[4] “Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” UNGA Resolution 76/47, 6 December 2021. Belarus also abstained from voting on this annual UNGA resolution from 2015–2020.
[5] Statement of Belarus, CCW Group of Governmental Experts on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 1 September 2010. Notes by Action on Armed Violence (AOAV).
[6] See, Army Technology projects database, accessed 14 June 2021.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey: Jane’s Information Group, 2004), p. 836.
[9] International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), The Military Balance 2011 (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 89; and Colin King, ed., Jane’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal 2007–2008, CD-edition, 15 January 2008 (Surrey: Jane’s Information Group, 2008).
[10] SIPRI, “Arms Transfers Database,” Belarus, “Transfers of major weapons: Deals with deliveries or orders made for 2010 to 2020,” generated 14 June 2021.
Mine Ban Policy
Policy
The Republic of Belarus acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 September 2003, becoming a State Party on 1 March 2004.
Belarus does not have specific national legislation to guide and enforce its implementation of the treaty, but reports that various articles of its Criminal Code are relevant, in addition to several decrees specific to antipersonnel mines.[1]
Since joining the Mine Ban Treaty, Belarus has participated in every Review Conference, and most meetings of States Parties and intersessional meetings. Belarus provided an update on its stockpile destruction process during the Fourth Review Conference held in Oslo in November 2019. This marked its last participation in a meeting of the Mine Ban Treaty. Belarus was invited to, but did not attend, the Nineteenth Meeting of States Parties held virtually in November 2021, and the intersessional meetings held in Geneva in June 2022.
Belarus has submitted a total of eighteen Article 7 transparency reports since acceding to the Mine Ban Treaty, submitting its most recent annual report in April 2022.
Belarus is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), its Amended Protocol II on landmines and Protocol V on explosive remnants of war (ERW). Belarus is not party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
Production and transfer
Upon joining the treaty in 2004, Belarus stated that it had not produced or exported antipersonnel mines since its independence in 1992, and that it had never used antipersonnel mines for protection of its borders or other purposes.[2]
Stockpiling and destruction
Belarus inherited a stockpile of approximately 4.5 million antipersonnel landmines after the break-up of the Soviet Union. It completed destruction of all its stockpiled antipersonnel mines in 2017.
From 2003 to the end of 2006, in cooperation with the Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and donor countries, Belarus destroyed 294,775 antipersonnel mines from stocks,[3] which constituted all of the landmines in its possession except for PFM-1 mines. A total of 217,133 landmines were destroyed by open detonation, while the POMZ-2 and POMZ-2M mines were disassembled at Belarusian industrial plants.
In 2006, Belarus also destroyed the victim-activated components of its 5,536 MON-type and 200,826 OZM-72 mines. Another 300,000 antipersonnel mines were destroyed from stocks between 1992 and 2003, before Belarus joined the treaty.
Belarus faced challenges in destroying its stockpile of 3,356,636 PFM-1 antipersonnel mines, and failed to meet its original stockpile destruction deadline of 1 March 2008.[4]
In November 2017, Belarus formally announced completion of stockpile destruction in compliance with its Article 4 obligations, at the Sixteenth Meeting of States Parties. This followed a statement by the Ministry of Defense on 5 April 2017 confirming that it had “fully fulfilled its international obligations under the Ottawa Convention” by completing the destruction of the stockpiled PFM-1 antipersonnel mines, with the support of the European Union (EU).[5]
Mines retained for research and training
In April 2022, Belarus reported that it retained 4,492 antipersonnel mines for research and training purposes: 1,486 PMN mines, 1,687 POMZ-2M mines, and 1,319 POMZ-2 mines.[6] According to Belarus, the antipersonnel mines have been retained for the training of mine detection dogs, testing of protective equipment and mine detectors, and training of personnel.[7]
Use
Upon joining the treaty in 2004, Belarus stated that it had never used antipersonnel landmines for protection of its borders or other purposes.[8] There is no credible information that Belarus has used antipersonnel landmines since joining the Mine Ban Treaty.
However, Belarus provided military support to Russia during its invasion of Ukraine from 24 February 2022, which has seen Russian forces use several types of antipersonnel landmines.[9] This is an unprecedented situation in which a country that is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty (Russia) is using the weapon on the territory of a party to the treaty (Ukraine).
As a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty, Belarus must ensure that its joint military operations with Russia do not violate the prohibition on assisting, encouraging, or inducing a state not party to engage in activities prohibited by the treaty. This means that it is prohibited for Belarus to:
- provide security, storage, transportation, or transit for antipersonnel mines;
- participate in planning for use of antipersonnel mines;
- commit to rules of engagement that permit use of antipersonnel mines;
- accept orders to use, request others to use, or train others to use antipersonnel mines; and
- knowingly derive military benefit from use of the weapon by others.
The Monitor is not aware of Belarus providing such assistance, either directly or indirectly, related to antipersonnel landmines since February 2022. However, Belarus should address these concerns with States Parties at a formal annual meeting of the treaty or in an updated Article 7 transparency report.
[1] See, Landmine Monitor Report 2006: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, July 2006), p. 189.
[2] Statement by Aleh Shloma, Representative of Belarus, United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) First Committee, New York, 21 October 2004.
[3] Composed of 45,425 PMN-1 mines, 114,384 PMN-2 mines, 12,799 POMZ-2 mines, 64,843 POMZ-2M mines, and 57,324 POM-2 mines.
[4] Statement of Belarus, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 20 June 2011; and Belarus Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2011. See, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Database.
[5] Statement of the Ministry of Defense of Belarus, “The Republic of Belarus has fully fulfilled its international obligations under the 2003 [sic] Ottawa Convention,” 5 April 2017.
[6] Belarus Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2022.
[7] This was first articulated in an interview with Maj.-Gen. Sergei Luchina, Ministry of Defense, and Valery Kolesnik, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Geneva, 15 June 2005. Belarus restated this at a meeting of the Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 25 June 2010.
[8] Statement by Aleh Shloma, Representative of Belarus, UNGA First Committee, New York, 21 October 2004.
[9] See, for example, Human Rights Watch (HRW), “Background Briefing on Landmines in Ukraine,” 15 June 2022.
Mine Action
Contamination and Impact
Mines
Belarus has a residual mine problem from World War II, although in its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 reports, Belarus has declared no known or suspected areas containing antipersonnel mines under its jurisdiction or control.[1] In 2009, for example, only three out of more than 45,000 items of explosive ordnance cleared were antipersonnel mines.
Cluster munition remnants
It is not known if there are any cluster munition remnants in Belarus.[2]
Other explosive remnants of war
Belarus is primarily contaminated by large quantities of explosive remnants of war (ERW), mainly unexploded ordnance from World War II, World War I, and even from the Napoleonic Wars. According to the Ministry of Defense, more than 350km2 are affected by ERW.[3] Heavy contamination has been reported in Brest, Gomel, Grodno, Minsk, Mogilev, and Vitebsk regions.[4] Most of the contaminated areas are said to be agricultural land or forest. None of the areas containing ERW are marked or fenced and little information is available to indicate the potential density of contamination.[5]
There is also a residual problem from abandoned explosive ordnance. For example, in December 2009, an arsenal of artillery shells, mortar shells, and more than 100 different types of grenade left from World War II was found in a forest near Pekalichi village in Jlobin region by clearance personnel of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.[6]
Contamination also includes explosive ordnance from military testing, as opposed to armed conflict.
Mine Action Program
Key institutions and operators
Body |
Situation on 1 January 2012 |
National Mine Action Authority |
None |
Mine action center |
None |
International demining operators |
None |
National demining operators |
Ministry of Defense engineers |
Belarus has neither a national mine action authority nor a national mine action center. Demining and explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) is conducted by both Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Internal Affairs’ personnel. The Ministry of Defense conducts planned clearance operations while the Ministry of Internal Affairs responds to emergency requests for EOD in cities, towns, and villages, and is also responsible for the detection and clearance of unexploded air-dropped bombs.
The Ministry of Defense engineers have 30 five-person clearance teams across 22 military districts with a total of 150 personnel. Their equipment, which includes mechanical demining assets, was most recently upgraded in 2008.[7] The Ministry of Internal Affairs has 10 EOD units with a total of 100 personnel and 20 mine detection dogs (MDDs): two MDD units with 10 dogs in each.[8]
In 2009, in accordance with Article 7 of Protocol V to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), Belarus officially applied for international assistance for clearance of ERW on its territory.[9]
Land Release
Belarus does not report on the size of area cleared, nor does it distinguish antivehicle mines from ERW destroyed during clearance operations.[10]
Since 1944, more than 27 million ERW are reported to have been cleared in Belarus.[11]
Quality management
There is no external quality assurance or quality control capacity in Belarus.[12]
[1] See, for example, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form C, submitted in 2012.
[2] Interview with Col. Alexander Tihonov, Head of Engineering Technical Department, Ministry of Defense, Minsk, 19 February 2010.
[3] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report, Form A, 4 September 2009.
[4] Letter from Dmitry Trenashkin, Ministry of Defense, 3 April 2007.
[5] Belarus, “ERW Database,” Discussion Paper 2/REV.1, 2008 Meeting of Experts of the States Parties to CCW Protocol V, May 2009, p. 6.
[6] “Cache of Black diggers,” Respublica, 4 December 2009, www.respublika.info .
[7] Col. Igor Lisovsky, Ministry of Defense, “Engineer Forces: History and Current State,” Vo slavu rodini, 21 January 2009, www.vsr.mil.by; and Belarus, “ERW Database,” Discussion Paper 2/REV.1, 2008 Meeting of Experts of the States Parties to CCW Protocol V, May 2009, p. 6.
[8] Belarus, “ERW Database,” Discussion Paper 2/REV.1, 2008 Meeting of Experts of the States Parties to CCW Protocol V, May 2009, p. 3.
[9] Article 10 Report, Form E, 4 September 2009.
[10] See, for example, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, submitted in 2012.
[11] Article 10 Report, Form A, 15 March 2010.
[12] Interview with Col. Alexander Tihonov, Ministry of Defense, Minsk, 19 February 2010.
Support for Mine Action
Belarus failed to meet its deadline of 1 March 2008 to destroy its stockpiles of antipersonnel mines. After a tender process on 21 December 2010, the European Commission (EC) awarded the Spanish company, Explosivos Alaveses (EXPAL), a 28-month contract valued at €3,900,000 (US$5,171,790).[1] Licensing and problems in importing equipment from Germany and Spain have delayed the start of the project. As of 21 May 2012, EXPAL had not destroyed any stockpiles.[2]
[1] EC, “Service procurement notice, UA-Kiev: ENPI — destruction of PFM-1 series ammunition in Belarus 2010/S 124-188668,” 30 June 2010; See ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Belarus: Mine Ban Policy,” 3 November 2011; Belarus, “Contract award notice, BY-Minsk: destruction of PFM-1 series ammunition in Belarus 2011/S 14-020376,” 21 January 2011; Information from Maria Cruz Cristobal, Mine Action Desk, Security Policy Unit, Directorate-General for External Relations, EC, through David Spence, Minister Counsellor, Delegation of the European Union to the UN in Geneva, 20 June 2011; Average exchange rate for 2010: €1=US$1.3261. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 6 January 2011.
[2] Statement of Belarus, Standing Committee Meeting on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 21 May 2012.
Casualties
Casualty Overview
All known casualties by end 2016 |
6,199 mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties (2,678 killed; 3,521 injured) |
Casualties in 2016 |
3 (2015: 2) |
2016 casualties by survival outcome |
1 killed; 2 injured (2015: 2 injured) |
2016 casualties by device type |
3 ERW |
In 2016, there were three reported new ERW casualties in the Republic of Belarus. Two children were killed and one injured in an incident involving unexploded World War II ordnance.[1]
No landmine casualties have been reported in Belarus since 2004.
There were at least 6,199 mine/ERW casualties (2,678 killed; 3,521 injured) in Belarus from 1945 to the end of 2016.[2]
[1] “The children decided to run around the field, they found a shell: What happened in the village of Veshevka,” TuT.by, 24 March 2016.
[2] Monitor Media scanning for 2015 and 2016 calendar years; and Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V Article 10 Report (for calendar year 2014), Form E.
Casualties and Victim Assistance
Casualties
Casualty Overview
All known casualties by end 2014 |
6,194 mine/ERW casualties (2,676 killed; 3,518 injured) |
Casualties in 2014 |
3 (2013: 0) |
2014 Casualties by outcome |
1 killed; 2 injured (2013: 0 killed) |
In 2014, there were three reported new casualties of explosive remnants of war (ERW) in the Republic of Belarus. A man and a woman were injured in an incident involving tampering with unexploded World War II ordnance in their home in April.[1] Another man was killed while looking for World War II-era ERW in November.[2] No new casualties were identified in Belarus in 2013. In 2012, two ERW casualties were identified: a father and son were killed in a tampering incident caused by an unexploded grenade.[3] No landmine casualties have been reported in Belarus since 2004.
There were at least 6,194 mine/ERW casualties (2,676 killed; 3,518 injured) in Belarus from 1945 to the end of 2014.[4]
Victim Assistance
Most mine/ERW survivors in Belarus were injured by ERW left over from World War II or during military service in Afghanistan in the 1980s. The total number of mine/ERW survivors in Belarus is unknown, and it has not been reported how many of the 3,513 registered survivors are still alive.
There is no specific victim assistance coordination or planning in Belarus. The Ministry of Labor and Social Protection is the main government agency responsible for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities.[5] The Ministry of Health and several other agencies also had a “State Programme on Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation of Disabled Persons” for the period from 2011 to 2015.[6]
As of 1 September 2014, Belarus had not signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).
[1] “В витебской квартире подорвался черный копатель” (“Black digger exploded in Vitebsk”), By24.org, 7 April 2014.
[2] “На снаряде времен Великой Отечественной войны подорвался «черный копатель» из Витебскойо” (“On the shells of the Great Patriotic War exploded ‘black diggers’ of the Vitebsk region”), Vitbichi online, 24 November 2014.
[3] “В КОБРИНЕ ДВОЕ МУЖЧИН ПОДОРВАЛИСЬ НА ГРАНАТЕ” (“N Kobrin Two Men Were Blown Up By Grenade”), 5MIN.BY, 25 April 2012.
[4] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report, Form E, 24 March 2014.
[5] “Resolution of the Council of Ministers, Republic of Belarus,” N 1589, 31 October 2001.
[6] Ibid., N 1126, 29 June 2010.