Landmine Monitor 2007
Mine Action Funding
For 2006, Landmine Monitor identified more than US$475 million of international funding for mine action donated by 26 countries and the European Commission. This is a substantial increase of approximately $100 million, or 27 percent, from 2005. Much, but not all, of the increase was due to emergency funding for coordination and clearance in Lebanon following the July-August 2006 conflict; in some cases donor states provided emergency funds to Lebanon from sources outside planned mine action budgets.[1]
The 2006 total of $475 million is the highest annual total of mine action recorded by Landmine Monitor, exceeding the previous highest annual total ($392 million in 2004) by approximately $83 million or more than 21 percent, and reversing the decrease registered in 2005. Excluding the increase in funding to Lebanon, total funding in 2006 was more than $37 million (roughly 10 percent) higher than in 2005 and roughly $21 million (about five percent) higher than in 2004. While funding overall was provided at record levels, not every mine-affected country received more funds in 2006 than in 2005. Notable increases occurred in some countries, for example, in Laos ($6.2 million increase) and Ethiopia ($5.3 million increase), while significant decreases were recorded in several countries including, for example, Sudan ($18 million decrease) and Sri Lanka ($9.1 million decrease); see later section on major mine action recipients. In 2006 as in previous years, funding was less than needed for many mine action programs.
Global Annual Mine Action Funding 1996-2006 (US$ millions)
The biggest contributors to global mine action in 2006 were the United States ($94.5 million), the European Commission ($87.3 million), Norway ($34.9 million), Canada ($28.9 million), Netherlands ($26.9 million), Japan ($25.3 million), United Arab Emirates ($19.9 million), United Kingdom ($19.3 million), Germany ($18.6 million) and Australia ($16.5 million). The largest contribution came from the EC combined with national funding by European Union member states, a total of $240.3 million (€191.2 million), as reported below.
Several donors provided more mine action funding than they had in any previous year. The EC, Canada, Netherlands, Denmark, Australia, Switzerland, Spain, Belgium, Ireland, Slovakia and Sweden each exceeded the amount of their previous highest annual contributions.[2] United Arab Emirates may also have contributed more in 2006 than any other year (a breakdown of annual funding by the UAE 2002-2004 is not available).
Some donor states increased their funding of mine action in 2006 as a result of revised or new national mine action assistance strategies. Of the 20 largest donors, 16 provided more funding in 2006 than 2005, and four provided less. The United Arab Emirates contributed $19.9 million to Lebanon in 2006 ($310,000 in 2005―the largest annual percentage increase). Other increases in terms of national/EC currency were: Spain (347 percent), Ireland (118 percent), Slovakia (90 percent), Australia (88 percent), EC (81 percent), Netherlands (38 percent), Canada (32 percent), Denmark (27 percent), Sweden (26 percent), Italy (21 percent), Switzerland (17 percent), United States (15 percent), Belgium (eight percent), Finland (six percent) and New Zealand (two percent).
At least 12 of the 20 major donors increased their contributions by at least $1 million: the EC ($39.5 million), UAE ($19.6 million), United States ($12.6 million), Canada ($8.4 million), Australia ($7.6 million), Netherlands ($7.6 million), Slovakia ($6.8 million), Spain ($6.7 million), Sweden ($3.2 million), Denmark ($3.1 million), Ireland ($2.6 million) and Switzerland ($2 million). Greece also contributed $2.4 million in 2006, with no donations reported for 2005.
Countries with the greatest decreases in terms of national currency were: Japan (32 percent), France (15 percent), Germany (13 percent), United Kingdom (11 percent) and Norway (five percent). Decreases of at least $1 million were recorded by: Japan ($13.9 million), Germany ($2.5 million), United Kingdom ($2.1 million) and Norway ($1.6 million).
Over one-tenth percent of gross national income (GNI) was donated for mine action in 2006 by: Slovakia (0.026 percent), the UAE (0.019 percent) and Norway (0.011 percent). The next largest donors in terms of GNI were Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Finland and Ireland.
Additional Mine Action-Related Funding in 2006
The $475 million total for donor countries does not include contributions to research and development (R&D) into demining technologies. In 2006 R&D funding totaled at least $26.7 million. The global total also excludes some victim assistance funding and in-kind contributions, UN peacekeeping funds, and funding by mine-affected countries of their own mine action programs. To avoid double reporting of funds, Landmine Monitor also does not include mine action contributions by NGOs and the private sector; among such funding items identified in 2006 were: $4 million raised by Adopt-a-Minefield for mine action in 11 countries; $2.8 million contributed by The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund; and $3.2 million received by Landmine Survivors Network (LSN) in private grants and individual donations.[3]
UNMAS reported more than $42 million allocated for mine action through UN peacekeeping funding in 2006 ($24.3 million in 2005). These funds covered the costs of mine action conducted in conjunction with peacekeeping operations mandated by the Security Council in the DR Congo, Ethiopia/Eritrea, Lebanon and Sudan. Expenditures from peacekeeping assessed budgets were reported as approximately $27 million in 2006.[4]
National Funding of Mine Action
Contributions to mine action by mine-affected countries themselves are not included in the $475 million donor total. In addition, Landmine Monitor identified at least 24 mine-affected states making monetary or in-kind contributions to their own mine action in 2006, with contributions totaling at least $84.3 million. This compares with roughly $50 million in 2005—however, reporting of national funding is incomplete and may not allow valid year-on-year comparisons. Many mine-affected countries do not make information available on their mine action expenditures. Contributions by mine-affected countries/areas reported in this year’s Landmine Monitor country reports include the following:
- Albania provided $233,000, in addition to funding of rehabilitation projects and unvalued in-kind contributions;
- Angola allocated $2.5 million for mine clearance in 2006, compared to $3 million in 2005;
- Azerbaijan provided $1.2 million in 2006, compared to roughly $750,000 in 2005 and $250,000 in 2004;
- Bosnia and Herzegovina contributed BAM20,070,706 ($12.5 million) from central and local authorities, an increase from BAM17,753,131 ($11.3 million) in 2005 (about 45 percent of the mine action budget in both years);
- Cambodia provided $1.2 million for mine action administration and programming;
- Chad contributed CFA165 million (some $300,000) to complement funding by UNDP;
- Chile provided $1.4 million, compared to approximately $1 million in government and armed forces contributions in 2005;
- Colombia provided COP2.562 billion ($1.1 million) for July 2006-June 2007, a large increase from $213,000 in July 2005-June 2006;
- Croatia provided HRK246,757,250 ($42.3 million) or 82 percent of mine action funding from state budgets and state and local bodies, compared with HRK192,769,625 ($32.4 million) or 57 percent in 2005;
- Guatemala allocated 1 million Quetzals (approximately $138,000) in 2006, and an additional $60,000 for residual clearance capacity, compared to total funding of $120,000 in 2005;
- Jordan provided JOD3,043,000 ($4.3 million) in 2006, including JOD373,000 ($529,809) in-kind;
- Kosovo contributed $106,000 through the UN Portfolio of Mine Action Projects to mine action in Kosovo;
- Lebanon provided in-kind contributions valued at $4 million, as well as additional contributions by the Lebanese Armed Forces for clearance of cluster munitions;
- Mauritania provided $750,000 for deminers’ salaries, equipment and infrastructure;
- Mozambique allocated MZN29.5 million ($1.1 million) in 2006, compared to MZN52.9 billion ($2.3 million) in 2005 and MZN178 billion ($7.9 million) in 2004;
- Peru gave 2,531,550 Soles ($795,413), including 881,550 Soles ($276,983) in monetary contributions;
- Rwanda provided $300,000, the same amount as reported for 2005;
- Serbia reported national funding of $770,897;
- Somaliland provided $15,000 for the Somaliland Mine Action Center;
- Sudan contributed $5.5 million, including full national coverage of some mine action expenses;
- Tajikistan gave $544,000, in addition to in-kind contributions;
- Thailand provided $480,744 in fiscal year 2006, compared to $950,000 in 2005;
- Yemen provided $3.5 million, or more than 50 percent of its national mine action budget; and,
- Zambia contributed $166,846, covering the Zambia Mine Action Center’s running costs and other mine action expenses.
Norway continued to chair the Mine Ban Treaty’s Resource Mobilization Contact Group (RMCG) in 2006. Among the issues addressed by the contact group during the year were assistance required by mine-affected States Parties to meet Article 5 mine clearance deadlines, data needed to improve allocation of mine action funding, and relevance of data to decision-makers. The United States assumed the chair of the Mine Action Support Group (MASG) in 2006, which it will retain until the end of 2007. There remained 27 donor states as members of the MASG in 2006.
In May 2006 the Mine Ban Treaty’s Contact Group on Linking Mine Action and Development was initiated by Canada to address the integration of mine action into the development sector, complementary to the work of the RMCG. The Contact Group first met at the Seventh Meeting of States Parties in September 2006. It intends to support States Parties in achieving the objectives of the Nairobi Action Plan and the OECD Peace and Development Cooperation Network in setting guidelines for donors addressing armed violence issues including mine action through development programming. In 2006 the Contact Group reported on the absence in some cases of an integrated approach by donors to security and development concerns in mine-affected countries, even where mine action had been integrated into poverty reduction and development plans, and the difficulty within development agencies of establishing mine action assistance through development funds in the face of competing priorities.[5]
Several donor countries addressed the issue of integrating mine action funding with development programming in 2006. Australia’s A$75 million pledged funding for mine action 2005-2009 has been integrated into broader AUSAID development programs. Canada continued to work towards integration of its mine action budget into development and other funding channels. In the fiscal year 2006-2007 over C$23 million of mine action funding (from a total $34 million including R&D funds) came from sources outside of the dedicated Canadian Landmine Fund. At the Standing Committee meetings in April 2007, Canada stated that the Fund had been “virtually phased out.” [6]
The end of 2006 marked the transition in EC mine action funding from a dedicated budget line for mine action to the integration of funds within new instruments regulating external assistance, the so-called Stability, Pre-accession, Neighbourhood and Development instruments. Administering and reporting mine action budget priorities will shift from centralized administration to EC delegations concerned with mine-affected states. At the April 2007 Standing Committee meetings the ICBL expressed its concern that the loss of a focal point for mine action in Brussels may lead to reduced funding for mine action; in some mine-affected countries national governments and EC delegations are reluctant to include mine action among development priorities. The EC responded that it shared the ICBL’s concerns and that successful mainstreaming would rely on the proper implementation of new responsibilities within the EC. [7]
Funding Channels
In 2006 trust funds reported receiving at least $109.3 million in mine action funding, equivalent to 23 percent of total donor-reported contributions.
The UN Voluntary Trust Fund for Assistance in Mine Action (VTF), operated by UNMAS, received contributions of about $51 million in 2006 including core and multi-year funding. Funds were received for mine action in eight countries in 2006: Afghanistan, Angola, Burundi, DR Congo, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Lebanon and Sudan.[8]
A total of $21.5 million, or 14.4 percent of its funds, was directed by the UNDP Thematic Trust Fund for Crisis Prevention and Recovery to mine action in 23 countries.[9]
The UN Development Group (UNDG) Iraq Trust Fund received $2.4 million in mine action funding from Greece in 2006.
The UN Trust Fund for Human Security (UNTFHS) contributed $3.6 million to mine action in Sudan and Lebanon. UNTFHS is a single donor trust fund, receiving contributions exclusively from Japan.[10]
The International Trust Fund for Demining and Mine Victims Assistance (ITF), based in Slovenia, received $30.8 million from 15 countries, the EC, UNDP, local authorities, government agencies and private donors in 2006. Funding was directed to mine action programs in Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, FYR Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia (including Kosovo).[11]
Mine Action Donors
Unless otherwise noted, figures are in US dollars.[12] Totals do not include R&D funds, which are identified separately where known.
1992-2006 |
$3.4 billion |
---|---|
2006 |
$475 million |
2005 |
$375 million |
2004 |
$392 million |
2003 |
$339 million |
2002 |
$324 million |
2001 |
$237 million |
2000 |
$243 million |
1999 |
$219 million |
1998 |
$187 million (incl. an estimated $9 m.) |
1992-1997 |
$529 million (incl. an estimated $110 m.) |
United States |
$802.8 million |
---|---|
European Commission |
$498.8 million |
Norway |
$290.5 million |
Japan |
$242.6 million |
United Kingdom |
$194.6 million |
Canada |
$177 million |
Germany |
$162.6 million |
Netherlands |
$160.8 million |
Sweden |
$141.5 million |
Denmark |
$124.3 million |
Switzerland |
$94 million |
Australia |
$91.6 million |
United Arab Emirates |
$69.9 million |
Italy |
$61.9 million |
Finland |
$58.4 million |
Belgium |
$41.1 million |
France |
$31.9 million |
Slovakia |
$24.9 million |
Ireland |
$21.1 million |
Spain |
$18.7 million |
Austria |
$18.4 million |
New Zealand |
$13.3 million |
Greece |
$12 million |
Other countries |
$37.1 million |
The total of $37.1 million for other countries includes Luxembourg ($7.2 million), China ($6.2 million), South Korea ($5.2 million), Slovenia ($4.6 million), Czech Republic ($3.3 million), Poland ($3.3 million), Saudi Arabia ($3 million), Iceland ($2.8 million) and some $1.5 million from Brazil, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Portugal, South Africa and others.
United States |
$94.5 million |
€75 million |
---|---|---|
EC |
$87.3 million |
€69.5 million |
Norway |
$34.9 million |
€27.8 million |
Canada |
$28.9 million |
€23 million |
Netherlands |
$26.9 million |
€21.4 million |
Japan |
$25.3 million |
€20.1 million |
United Arab Emirates |
$19.9 million |
€15.8 million |
United Kingdom |
$19.3 million |
€15.4 million |
Germany |
$18.6 million |
€14.8 million |
Australia |
$16.5 million |
€13.2 million |
Sweden |
$14.9 million |
€11.9 million |
Denmark |
$14.5 million |
€11.5 million |
Switzerland |
$14.1 million |
€11.2 million |
Slovakia |
$14 million |
€11.2 million |
Spain |
$8.6 million |
€6.8 million |
Belgium |
$7.1 million |
€5.6 million |
Finland |
$6.3 million |
€5 million |
Italy |
$5.4 million |
€4.3 million |
Ireland |
$4.8 million |
€3.8 million |
France |
$3.3 million |
€2.6 million |
Greece |
$2.4 million |
€1.9 million |
Austria |
$2.2 million |
€1.8 million |
Poland |
$1.3 million |
€1.1 million |
Luxembourg |
$1.3 million |
€1 million |
Czech Republic |
$1.2 million |
€1 million |
New Zealand |
$0.9 million |
€0.7 million |
Slovenia |
$0.8 million |
€0.6 million |
EC funding together with national funding by European Union member states totaled $240.3 million (€191.2 million) in 2006, as reported below.[17] This combined total was the largest source of mine action funding in 2006, as in 2005. It was also a large increase from the 2005 combined total of $187 million identified by Landmine Monitor.
Slovakia |
0.02635% |
---|---|
United Arab Emirates |
0.01922% |
Norway |
0.01130% |
Denmark |
0.00516% |
Netherlands |
0.00385% |
Sweden |
0.00379% |
Luxembourg |
0.00369% |
Switzerland |
0.00330% |
Finland |
0.00297% |
Ireland |
0.00248% |
Canada |
0.00245% |
Australia |
0.00224% |
Slovenia |
0.00207% |
Belgium |
0.00175% |
Greece |
0.00098% |
Czech Republic |
0.00092% |
United Kingdom |
0.00080% |
New Zealand |
0.00076% |
Spain |
0.00072% |
United States |
0.00070% |
Austria |
0.00068% |
Germany |
0.00062% |
Japan |
0.00052% |
Poland |
0.00043% |
Italy |
0.00029% |
France |
0.00014% |
2006 |
$94.5 million |
---|---|
2005 |
$81.9 million |
2004 |
$96.5 million |
2003 |
$80.6 million |
2002 |
$73.8 million |
2001 |
$69.2 million |
2000 |
$82.4 million |
1999 |
$63.1 million |
1998 |
$44.9 million |
1993-1997 |
$115.9 million |
- Figures do not include mine victim assistance funding; funding for war victims programs totaled anadditional $14.75 million in fiscal year 2006.
- R&D totaled an additional $13.81 million in fiscal year 2006, $13.15 million in fiscal year 2005, and $159.8 million for fiscal years 1995-2006.
The United States provided $94,450,000 to mine action in 28 countries and other areas in 2006, compared to $81.9 million to 23 recipients in 2005. Emergency funding to Lebanon accounted for roughly $9.6 million of total funding.[19]
2006 |
$87.3 million |
€69.5 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$47.7 million |
€38.3 million |
2004 |
$59.1 million |
€47.5 million |
2003 |
$64.5 million |
€57 million |
2002 |
$38.7 million |
€40.7 million |
2001 |
$23.5 million |
€26.1 million |
2000 |
$14.3 million |
€15.9 million |
1999 |
$15.5 million |
€17.3 million |
1998 |
$21.4 million |
€23.8 million |
1992-1997 |
$126.8 million |
€141.2 million |
- In 2006 the EC and EU member states together provided $240.3 million (€191.2 million) of mine action funding.
- With the mainstreaming of mine action funding within EC geographic and thematic budget lines, and the decentralization of budgeting and accounting from Brussels to EC delegations, Landmine Monitor can no longer obtain EC funding data from a single central source. EC data for 2006 has been collated from several sources, including EuropeAid, EC 2006 Annual Work Plan for Budget Line 19 02 04, and EC delegations to mine-affected countries. The necessity of working in this way increases the possibility of funding items being missed or, conversely, being double-counted, although every care has been taken.
- No R&D funding was reported by the EC in 2006. In 2005 EC R&D funding totaled €1,090,000 ($1,356,941), and from 1992-2006 €51 million.
The European Commission allocated €69,460,162 ($87,262,802) to mine action in 2006. This was an increase of 81.2 percent from €38,337,001 ($47,725,733) in 2005.[23] Direct comparison is misleading, however, because the 2006 total includes multi-year commitments, funds allocated but not disbursed during the year, and funds incorporating some disbursements in previous years (as, for example, in the case of Angola), from which it has not been possible to fully identify and separate actual disbursements during 2006. The EC provided mine action funding to 25 countries and other areas in 2006, compared to 17 countries in 2005. Countries and other areas receiving EC funding in 2006 but not 2005 included Abkhazia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Chechnya, Cyprus, Ethiopia, Kosovo, Laos, Lebanon, Mozambique, Nepal, Somalia, Somaliland, Thailand, Ukraine and Yemen. Those receiving EC funding in 2005 but not 2006 included Belarus, Croatia, Cyprus, Jordan and Uganda. Contributing to the increase in EC funding were significant contributions to Afghanistan (€26 million/$32.7 million), Angola (€12.4 million/$15.5 million), Lebanon (€7.5 million/$9.4 million), and Ethiopia (€3.9 million/$4.9 million).
The Commission of the European Communities (commonly known as the European Commission) most resembles the executive or civil service branch of government in the sense that it generates and executes policies, but does not legislate. It has been a donor to mine action since at least 1992 and a major donor since the creation of the Mine Ban Treaty.
During this reporting period the 25 member states of the European Union were Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, Those marked in bold are also major donors at the national level and are detailed in reports on national funding following in this section.
Neither the European Commission nor EU member states were able to provide a breakdown of how much of EC funding should be ascribed to individual member states. Therefore, it is not possible for Landmine Monitor to provide a complete picture of EU members’ mine action funding.
2006 |
$34.9 million |
NOK223.9 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$36.5 million |
NOK235 million |
2004 |
$34.3 million |
NOK231.2 million |
2003 |
$28.6 million |
NOK202.4 million |
2002 |
$25.4 million |
NOK202.9 million |
2001 |
$20 million |
NOK176.9 million |
2000 |
$19.5 million |
NOK178.6 million |
1999 |
$21.5 million |
NOK178.6 million |
1998 |
$24 million |
|
1994-1997 |
$45.8 million |
NOK343 million |
- In previous years Norway has contributed to R&D: NOK3,983,375 ($618,421) in 2005, and NOK2,250,000 ($333,833) in 2004.[24]
Norway’s mine action funding in 2006–NOK223,875,323 ($34,924,551), a five percent decrease from 2005 (NOK235,020,163 or $36,487,015)–was allocated to 15 countries/areas (18 in 2005), as well as to NGOs, GICHD, UN agencies and the Norwegian Red Cross. Countries receiving funds from Norway in 2006 but not 2005 included Guinea-Bissau and Montenegro, while Eritrea, Guatemala, Colombia, and Cambodia were among countries receiving funds in 2005 but not 2006.
2006 |
$25.3 million |
¥2,944 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$39.3 million |
¥4,323 million |
2004 |
$42.8 million |
¥4,630 million |
2003 |
$13 million |
¥1,590 million |
2002 |
$49.7 million |
¥5,537 million |
2001 |
$7.5 million |
¥802 million |
2000 |
$12.7 million |
¥1,480 million |
1999 |
$16 million |
¥1,904 million |
1998 |
$6.3 million |
¥722 million |
Pre-1998 approx. |
$30 million |
- R&D funding totaled ¥1,058 million ($9.1 million) in 2006, ¥811 million ($7.4 million) in 2005, and ¥3,424 million ($29.4 million) from 1999 to 2006.
In 2006 Japan contributed ¥2,944 million ($25.3 million), 32 percent less than in 2005 (¥4,323 million or $39.3 million). Much of the reduction was due to decreased funding for Sudan (¥624 million/$5.4 million in 2006; ¥2.1 billion/$19 million in 2005). Japan gave funds in 2006 to 14 countries including to Burundi, Jordan, Lebanon, Nicaragua and Senegal, none of which received funds from Japan in 2005. Colombia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq, Tajikistan and Yemen received funds from Japan in 2005 but not 2006.
2006-2007 |
$19.3 million |
£10.5 million |
---|---|---|
2005-2006 |
$21.4 million |
£11.8 million |
2004-2005 |
$20.4 million |
£11.1million |
2003-2004 |
$20 million |
£12.3 million |
2002-2003 |
$18.5 million |
£12.5 million |
2001-2002 |
$15.4 million |
£10.7 million |
2000-2001 |
$21.5 million |
£15 million |
1999-2000 |
$20.4 million |
£13.6 million |
1998-1999 |
$6.5 million |
£4.6 million |
1993-1997 |
$31.2 million |
- Figures do not include victim assistance funding.
- Additionally, R&D totaled £213,656 ($393,853) in 2006-2007, £1,777,563 ($3,235,165) in 2005-2006, and £9.1 million ($15 million) from 1999-2000 to 2005-2006.
UK funding of £10,491,251 ($19,339,572) in fiscal year 2006-2007 represented a decrease of 11 percent from 2005-2006. In 2006-2007 the UK Department for International Development (DfiD) reported mine action funding for 14 states and other areas. Abkhazia, Guinea-Bissau, Jordan, Laos and Lebanon received funds in 2006 but not in 2005. Ethiopia and Tajikistan received funds from the UK in 2005 but not in 2006. Funding to Lebanon totaled £2.3 million ($4.3 million) in 2006.
2006 |
$28.9 million |
C$32.8 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$20.5 million |
C$24.8 million |
2004 |
$22.6 million |
C$29.5 million |
2003 |
$22.5 million |
C$30.8 million |
2002 |
$15.1 million |
C$22.3 million |
2001 |
$15.5 million |
C$24 million |
2000 |
$11.9 million |
C$17.7 million |
1999 |
$15.2 million |
C$23.5 million |
1998 |
$9.5 million |
|
1989-1997 |
$15.3 million |
C$23.1 million |
- Canada provided C$1,225,858 ($1,080,962) for R&D in 2006. Additionally, R&D funding totaled C$3.4 million ($2.8 million) in 2005, C$3.1 million ($2.4 million) in 2004, and $17.4 million from 1998-2006.
Canada’s mine action funding of C$32,770,866 ($28,897,350) in fiscal year 2006-2007 was an increase of 32 percent from 2005-2006 and the highest total reported for Canada to date. It provided funding to 28 countries and areas as well as regional bodies, UN agencies, NGOs, ICRC and GICHD. Funding to Lebanon totaled C$3.1 million ($2.8 million) in 2006, at least part of which was covered by emergency relief.[31]
2006 |
$18.6 million |
€14.8 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$21.1 million |
€17 million |
2004 |
$18.7 million |
€15 million |
2003 |
$22.1 million |
€19.5 million |
2002 |
$19.4 million |
€20.4 million |
2001 |
$12.3 million |
DM26.8 million, €13.7 million |
2000 |
$14.5 million |
DM27.6 million |
1999 |
$11.4 million |
DM21.7 million |
1998 |
$10.1 million |
|
1993-1997 |
$14.4 million |
Germany’s funding of €14,838,320 ($18,641,381) in 2006 was a decrease of 13 percent from 2005, and included 20 countries and regions (21 in 2005). Countries and areas receiving funding in 2006 but not in 2005 included Chile, Mauritania, Tajikistan and Western Sahara. Countries receiving funding from Germany in 2005 but not in 2006 included Colombia, Eritrea, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique and Somalia.
In May 2006 Germany stated that it no longer funds R&D, focusing in preference on mine clearance. No R&D funding was identified in 2005 and 2000-2003; 2004: €102,989 ($128,098); 1993-1999: $5.1 million.
2006 |
$26.9 million |
€21.4 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$19.3 million |
€15.5 million |
2004 |
$19.3 million |
€15.5 million |
2003 |
$12.1 million |
|
2002 |
$16 million |
|
2001 |
$13.9 million |
Dfl 32 million, €15.5 million |
2000 |
$14.2 million |
Dfl 35.4 million |
1999 |
$8.9 million |
Dfl 23 million |
1998 |
$9.3 million |
|
1996-97 |
$20.9 million |
The Netherlands increased funding in 2006 by 38 percent, to €21,433,318 ($26,926,677); this was its highest total reported to date. It provided funding to 15 countries and other areas. Lebanon received significant funds in 2006 (€4,150,000/$5,213,645).
2006 |
$14.9 million |
SEK110.1 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$11.7 million |
SEK87.6 million |
2004 |
$11.4 million |
SEK83.5 million |
2003 |
$12.7 million |
SEK102.9 million |
2002 |
$7.3 million |
SEK71 million |
2001 |
$9.8 million |
SEK100.9 million |
2000 |
$11.8 million |
SEK107.9 million |
1999 |
$9.8 million |
SEK83.3 million |
1998 |
$16.6 million |
SEK129.5 million |
1990-1997 |
$35.5 million |
- All figures are for funds disbursed, with the exception of 1990-1996 (funds allocated).
- Figures do not include victim assistance funding.
- Sweden has in the past funded R&D (approximately $24 million 1994-1999 and $1.7 million in 2003); R&D funding in 2006 is not known.
In 2006 Sweden provided SEK110,063,937 ($14,935,677), a 26 percent increase in mine action funding, for nine countries/areas: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Angola, Chechnya, Iraq, Lebanon, Nicaragua, Somalia and Sri Lanka. Countries receiving funds from Sweden in 2005 but not 2006 were DR Congo, Philippines and Senegal.
2006 |
$14.5 million |
DKK86.1 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$11.3 million |
DKK67.7 million |
2004 |
$13.7 million |
DKK82.3 million |
2003 |
$11.9 million |
DKK78.6 million |
2002 |
$10.6 million |
DKK83.5 million |
2001 |
$14.4 million |
DKK119.4 million |
2000 |
$13.4 million |
DKK106.7 million |
1999 |
$7 million |
DKK49.9 million |
1998 |
$6.2 million |
DKK44.3 million |
1992-1997 |
$21.3 million |
- Figures for 1992-1995 do not include bilateral contributions.
- Denmark did not report R&D funding in 2006. It has funded R&D programs in the past, but the value is not known.
Denmark contributed DKK86,092,534 ($14,489,373) in 2006, the largest amount to date and a 27 percent increase compared to 2005. Funds included a contribution to Lebanon, which Denmark did not fund in 2005.
2006 |
$14.1 million |
CHF 17.6 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$12.1 million |
CHF15.1 million |
2004 |
$10.9 million |
CHF14.8 million |
2003 |
$8.8 million |
|
2002 |
$8.3 million |
|
2001 |
$9.8 million |
|
2000 |
$7.4 million |
|
1999 |
$5.7 million |
|
1998 |
unknown |
|
1993-1997 |
$16.9 million |
Switzerland’s 2006 mine action funding of CHF17,633,800 ($14,071,772) was a 17 percent increase from 2005, and its highest funding to date. The 2006 total included CHF8,020,000 ($6,399,960) for the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining and CHF9,613,800 ($7,671,812) for other mine action (non-GICHD funding in 2005 was CHF7,094,000/$5.7 million). Switzerland funded 13 countries and areas in 2006, and 13 in 2005. Chechnya and Jordan received funds from Switzerland in 2006 but not in 2005; the DR Congo and Vietnam received funds in 2005 but not in 2006. Sudan received a substantial increase in 2006 (CHF1,750,000/$1,396,500) compared to 2005 (CHF300,000/$240,790). The 2006 total includes an estimate of CHF2 million ($1,596,000) for in-kind contributions of personnel and material to various organizations by the Swiss Ministry of Defense.
The totals since 2000 include significant funds for GICHD, most of which could be counted as R&D funding. Swiss funding for GICHD totaled $6.4 million in 2006, $6 million in 2005, $6.1 million in 2004, $5.23 million in 2003, $4.35 million in 2002, $3.3 million in 2001 and $2.3 million in 2000, totaling some $33.7 million from 2000-2006.
Switzerland’s mine action strategy 2004-2007 forecast annual funding of roughly CHF16 million; funding in 2005 fell short of this target, while 2006 funding exceeded it. The strategy was under review in mid-2007.[38]
2006-2007 |
$16.5 million |
A$21.9 million |
---|---|---|
2005-2006 |
$8.9 million |
A$11.7 million |
2004-2005 |
$5.7 million |
A$7.8 million |
2003-2004 |
$5.5 million |
A$8.2 million |
2002-2003 |
$7.8 million |
A$14.5 million |
2001-2002 |
$6.6 million |
A$12.9 million |
2000-2001 |
$7.3 million |
A$12.6 million |
1999-2000 |
$7.9 million |
A$12.4 million |
1998-1999 |
$6.8 million |
A$11.1 million |
1995-1998 |
$18.6 million |
A$24.9 million |
- Australia has funded R&D programs in the past, but the total value is not known.
Australia’s funding of A$21,928,363 ($16,523,022) in fiscal year July 2006-June 2007 was an 88 percent increase, and its largest contribution to date, for mine action in 11 countries (seven in 2005). Funding in 2006 included A$1.5 million ($1,130,250) to Lebanon. The 2006-2007 level of funding, although much greater than the previous year, was reported to be in line with the overall A$75 million in funding committed by Australia for 2005-2010.[41]
United Arab Emirates - $69.9 million
In 2006 the United Arab Emirates contributed $19,881,982 to Lebanon via the Operation Emirates Solidarity II program. The UAE previously reported that it provided $50 million to mine action in Lebanon from 2002-2004 (annual breakdown not available). The UAE contributed $3,332,751 for Lebanon through the UN Voluntary Trust Fund in 2002-2005, including $310,000 for follow-up activities to Operation Emirates Solidarity in 2005.
2006 |
$5.4 million |
€4.3 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$4.5 million |
€3.6 million |
2004 |
$3.2 million |
€2.5 million |
2003 |
$5.8 million |
€5.1 million |
2002 |
$8.7 million |
€9.9 million |
2001 |
$5.1 million |
L11.2 billion, €5.6 million |
2000 |
$1.6 million |
L4.3 billion, €1.7 million |
1999 |
$5.1 million |
L13.9 billion, €4.8 million |
1998 |
$12 million |
L20 billion |
1995-1997 |
$10.5 million |
L18 billion |
Italy’s mine action funding of €4,322,741 ($5,430,660) in 2006 was a 21 percent increase from 2005, for 11 countries (six in 2005). Countries receiving funding from Italy in 2006 but not in 2005 were Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Lebanon, Nicaragua and Peru. Emergency funding to Lebanon totaled $2,512,900, from funds outside the planned mine action budget.[43] Iraq received contributions in 2005 but not 2006. Italy also contributed general mine action funds to the Organization of American States in 2006.
2006 |
$6.3 million |
€5 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$5.9 million |
€4.7million |
2004 |
$6 million |
€4.8 million |
2003 |
$6.3 million |
€5.6 million |
2002 |
$4.5 million |
€4.8 million |
2001 |
$4.5 million |
€5 million |
2000 |
$4.8 million |
|
1999 |
$5.7 million |
|
1998 |
$6.6 million |
|
1991-1997 |
$7.8 million |
Finland contributed €5,046,691 ($6,340,158), an increase of six percent from 2005 (€4,746,000/US$5,908,295). The increase is in part accounted for by €1,000,000 in funding to Lebanon, which did not receive funds from Finland in 2005. Funding was allocated to nine countries and three organizations in 2006. See the Finland report for more details.
2006 |
$7.1 million |
€5.6 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$6.5 million |
€5.2 million |
2004 |
$5.7 million |
€4.6 million |
2003 |
$6.2 million |
€5.5 million |
2002 |
$3.6 million |
€3.8 million |
2001 |
$2.1 million |
€2.2 million |
2000 |
$2.5 million |
BEF111 million |
1999 |
$2.3 million |
BEF93 million |
1994-1998 |
$5.1 million |
- R&D totaled €727,650 ($914,147) in 2006, €456,314 ($568,065) in 2005, and $10.7 million from 1994-2006.
Belgium’s mine action funding of €5,622,230 ($7,063,208) in 2006 was an increase of 8 percent from 2005, and the highest level of funding it has reported to date. Belgium provided mine action funding and assistance to 10 countries in 2006 (11 countries/areas in 2005).
2006 |
$3.3 million |
€2.6 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$3.8 million |
€3.1 million |
2004 |
$1.9 million |
€1.5 million |
2003 |
$2.5 million |
€2.2 million |
2002 |
$3.6 million |
€3.8 million |
2001 |
$2.7 million |
€3 million |
2000 |
$1.2 million |
|
1999 |
$0.9 million |
|
1995-1998 |
$12 million |
- R&D spending was not reported by France for 2006 or 2005. In 2004, R&D contributions totaled €1.4 million ($2.2 million).
France reported a 15 percent decrease in mine action funding in 2006 (€2,601,263/ $3,267,967) from 2005. This included in-kind contributions and training, for 25 recipient countries and areas (six countries in 2005). France reported in 2007 that it contributes between 17 and 25 percent of EC funding to mine action projects through various channels.
2006 |
$14 million |
SKK415.7 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$7.2 million |
SKK218.5 million |
2004 |
$3.5 million |
SKK101.9 million |
1996-2002 |
$230,000 |
Slovakia reported contributing SKK415,660,309 ($14,007,752) as the value of in-kind contributions of the Slovak Armed Forces to demining operations in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2006, the highest contribution to date.
2006 |
$4.8 million |
€3.8 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$2.2 million |
€1.7 million |
2004 |
$3 million |
€2.4 million |
2003 |
$2.3 million |
€2 million |
2002 |
$1.6 million |
€1.7 million |
2001 |
$2 million |
€2.2 million |
2000 |
$1.1 million |
|
1999 |
$1.5 million |
|
1994-1998 |
$2.6 million |
Ireland’s mine action funding of €3,790,000 ($4,761,377) in 2006 was a 118 percent increase from 2005, and its largest annual contribution reported, contributed to six countries and Somaliland. Cambodia, Iraq, Laos and Lebanon received funding from Ireland in 2006 but not 2005.
2006 |
$2.2 million |
€1.8 million |
---|---|---|
2005 |
$2.2 million |
€1.8 million |
2004 |
$3 million |
€2.4 million |
2003 |
$0.9 million |
€0.8 million |
2002 |
$2 million |
€2.1 million |
2001 |
$0.9 million |
ATS13.7 million |
2000 |
$2 million |
ATS30 million |
1999 |
$1 million |
ATS15 million |
1994-1998 |
$4.2 million |
Austria provided €1,763,506 ($2,215,493) in 2006, roughly the same amount as in 2005 (€1,766,752 or $2,199,430), for four countries (seven in 2005). Lebanon and Sudan received funding from Austria in 2006 but not in 2005. Austria reported that it also provides approximately 2.2 percent of overall EC development aid expenditures which include mine action contributions.[56]
2006-2007 |
$0.9 million |
NZ$1.3 million |
---|---|---|
2005-2006 |
$0.9 million |
NZ$1.3 million |
2004-2005 |
$2.5 million |
NZ$3.7 million |
2003-2004 |
$1.1 million |
NZ$1.6 million |
2002-2003 |
$0.8 million |
NZ$1.4 million |
2001-2002 |
$0.7 million |
NZ$1.7 million |
2000-2001 |
$1.1 million |
NZ$2.3 million |
1999-2000 |
$0.8 million |
NZ$1.6 million |
1998-1999 |
$0.5 million |
NZ$0.9 million |
1992-1998 |
$4 million |
NZ$6.9 million |
- New Zealand has funded R&D programs previously, but annual totals are not available.
New Zealand reported contributions totaling NZ$1,321,660 ($858,022) for mine action during fiscal year July 2006-June 2007, a slight increase from NZ$1,290,723 ($909,831) in 2005-2006. Vietnam received funds in 2006 but not 2005. New Zealand contributed to Cambodia, DR Congo, Mozambique, Nepal and Sudan in 2005 but not 2006.
Other Mine Action Donors
Spain provided €6,847,734 ($8,602,808) in 2006, including in-kind contributions through training at its International Demining Center. Spain reported that it had “increased significantly” its contributions to mine action in 2006 and “would maintain this profile as a donor state” in 2007.[59] Spain contributed €1,533,648 ($1,909,238) in 2005. Estimated total mine action funding to date was $18.7 million.
Greece contributed €1.9 million ($2.4 million) in February 2006 for mine action in Iraq; the funds were pledged in July 2005.[60] Mine action funding by Greece totaled $12 million for 2001-2006.
Luxembourg provided €1,032,375 ($1,296,973) for mine action in five countries in 2006, similar to 2005 (€1,081,931/$1,346,896).[61] No R&D funding was reported in 2006 or 2005. Total mine action funding to date was $7.2 million.
Slovenia reported contributing SIT150,099,998 ($780,520) in 2006.[62] It provided $384,498 in 2005. Total mine action funding to date was $4.6 million.
Landmine Monitor is not aware of funding by the Republic of Korea or Iceland in 2006. The Republic of Korea contributed $1,050,000 to mine action 2005. Total mine action funding is $5.2 million.[63] Iceland provided $1,500,000 for victim assistance in 2005. Total mine action funding was $2.8 million 1997-2006.
The Czech Republic contributed CZK26,955,311 ($1,194,120) for mine action in 2006, a decrease of 18 percent from 2005 (CZK32,886,000/$1,370,794), for Afghanistan, Croatia and Lebanon.[64] Estimated total mine action funding to date was $3.3 million.
Poland contributed $1,332,815 to mine action in 2006. Its 2007 voluntary Article 7 report did not include a value for additional in-kind contributions in 2006. A €50,000 contribution to Bosnia and Herzegovina was reported. Landmine Monitor identified in-kind assistance to Lebanon of $1,270,000. In 2005 the reported value of Poland’s in-kind assistance to mine action was €1.6 million ($1.99 million). Total mine action funding for 2005-2006 was $3.3 million.
Research and Development Projects Reported by Donors
In 2006 five countries reported spending about $25.3 million on R&D related to mine action, a decrease of some 16 percent from 2005 ($30 million contributed by nine countries). The biggest expenditures were by the United States ($13.81 million), Japan ($9.1 million) and Canada ($1.1 million). Contributions were also made by Belgium and the United Kingdom.
Belgium contributed €727,650 ($914,147) for four R&D projects, including €51,500 ($64,699) for software development for mine clearance, €253,350 ($318,284) for detection technologies and methodologies, €122,800 ($154,274) for the International Test and Evaluation Program for Humanitarian Demining (ITEP), and €300,000 ($376,890) to APOPO for the use of rats in humanitarian mine clearance operations.[65]
Canada contributed C$1,225,858 ($1,080,962) to R&D including C$1 million ($881,800) to the Canadian Centre for Mine Action Technology, C$100,858 ($88,937) to APOPO for the use of rats in clearance operations, and C$125,000 ($110,225) for a technology expert to GICHD.[66]
Japan reported ¥1,058,000,000 ($9,098,800) in R&D funding, including ¥547,000,000 ($4,704,200) through the Japan Science and Technology Agency for research programs in explosives sensor technology, ¥95,000,000 ($817,000) to the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization for research including portable and vehicle-mounted mine detector technology, and ¥416,000,000 ($3,577,600) to Cambodia for R&D of mine clearance equipment.[67]
The UK provided R&D funding of £213,656 ($393,853) in fiscal year 2006-2007, consisting of £28,870 ($53,219) to DISARMCO and £184,786 ($340,635) to ERA.[68]
The US Department of Defense spent $13.81 million on humanitarian demining R&D projects in fiscal year 2006. Of that total, $13.81 million was included in the Department of Defense budget.[69]
In past years Landmine Monitor has reported funding to GICHD (except for funds specified for sponsorship and treaty implementation support) as R&D. However, in this edition of Landmine Monitor funds are counted as R&D only if specified for these purposes. Switzerland continued to provide GICHD with funding in 2006. Although some of this may be for R&D, Landmine Monitor has included the whole amount of GICHD funding within Switzerland’s general mine action funding because R&D amounts are not consistently differentiated.
Major Mine Action Recipients
Landmine Monitor has identified at least eight mine action funding recipients that have received more than $100 million in funding to date: Afghanistan ($602.5 million since 1993),[70] Iraq ($288.3 million since 1993), Cambodia ($285.6 million since 1993), Angola ($225.1 million since 1993), Mozambique ($220.2 million since 1993), Bosnia and Herzegovina ($181.8 million since 1995), Lebanon (estimated $154.8 million since 2000) and Sudan ($108.9 million since 2001). Also, Kosovo ($95 million since 1999) and Laos ($82.4 million since 1994) have each received close to $100 million to date.
2006 Global Mine Action Funding by Region[71]
CHART MISSING HERE!!!!!
The top recipients of mine action funding in 2006 were Afghanistan ($87.5 million), Lebanon ($68.8 million), Angola ($48.1 million), Iraq ($35.3 million), Cambodia ($29.6 million) and Sudan ($28.9 million).
Notable increases–at least $5 million–in 2006 were seen in Lebanon (up $62.5 million or 992 percent), Afghanistan ($20.7 million, 31 percent), Angola ($12.3 million, 34 percent), Iraq ($7.5 million, 27 percent), Laos ($6.2 million, 85 percent), Ethiopia ($5.3 million, 202 percent), and Jordan ($5 million, 342 percent).[72]
Significant reductions in mine action funding–at least $2 million–occurred in Sudan (down $18 million, 38 percent), Sri Lanka ($9.1 million, 48 percent), Mozambique ($3.8 million, 38 percent), Croatia ($2.9 million, 31 percent) and Albania ($3 million, 57 percent).
Afghanistan |
$87.5 million |
€69.7 million |
---|---|---|
Lebanon |
$68.8 million |
€54.8 million |
Angola |
$48.1 million |
€38.3 million |
Iraq |
$35.3 million |
€28.1 million |
Cambodia |
$29.6 million |
€23.5 million |
Sudan |
$28.9 million |
€23 million |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
$18.8 million |
€14.9 million |
Laos |
$13.4 million |
€10.7 million |
Sri Lanka |
$9.9 million |
€7.9 million |
Vietnam |
$8.3 million |
€6.6 million |
Ethiopia |
$7.9 million |
€6.3 million |
Croatia |
$6.5 million |
€5.2 million |
Jordan |
$6.5 million |
€5.2 million |
Mozambique |
$6.2 million |
€5 million |
Nicaragua |
$5.7 million |
€4.6 million |
DR Congo |
$5.1 million |
v4.1 million |
Azerbaijan |
$4.8 million |
€3.8 million |
Colombia |
$4.3 million |
€3.5 million |
Yemen |
$4.1 million |
€3.2 million |
Abkhazia |
$3.1 million |
€2.5 million |
Burundi |
$3 million |
€2.4 million |
Somaliland |
$2.9 million |
€2.3 million |
Chad |
$2.4 million |
€1.9 million |
Chile |
$2.3 million |
€1.9 million |
Albania |
$2.3 million |
€1.8 million |
Kosovo |
$2 million |
€1.6 million |
Somalia |
$1.7 million |
€1.4 million |
Uganda |
$1.7 million |
€1.3 million |
Chechnya |
$1.3 million |
€1.1 million |
Cyprus |
$1.3 million |
€1 million |
Tajikistan |
$1.1 million |
€847,556 |
Thirty-one countries and areas received at least $1 million in mine action funding in 2006 (31 in 2005). In addition, $1.9 million (€1.5 million) in donations were reported jointly to Montenegro and Serbia in 2006, without values differentiated for each.[73] Jordan ($6.5 million), Chile ($2.3 million), Somalia ($1.7 million), and Tajikistan ($1.1 million) each received at least $1 million in 2006, but less than $1 million in 2005. Nagorno-Karabakh received more than $1 million in 2005 but not in 2006.
2006 Major Recipient Funding Increases[74]
Major Mine Action Recipients
- Abkhazia - $3,100,477 (approximately €2.5 million) for mine action in 2006 were reported by four countries and the EC, a decrease of roughly five percent from 2005 ($3,253,162 reported by two countries).
- Afghanistan - $87,534,418 (€69.7 million) for mine action in 2006 was donated by 18 countries and the EC, an increase of 31 percent from 2005 ($66.8 million from 16 countries and the EC) and roughly equal to funding levels in 2004 ($91.8 million from 16 countries and the EC); a substantial portion of 2006 funds came from end-year allocations by the EC totaling €20 million ($32.7 million). UNMAS reported that “disruptions in funding” severely affected operations in 2006.
- Albania - $2,298,716 (€1.8 million) was donated in 2006 by three countries, a decrease of 57 percent from 2005 ($5,316,712 from three countries and the EC).
- Angola - $48,108,122 (€38.3 million) was donated in 2006 by 16 countries and the EC, an increase of 34 percent from 2005 ($35,771,510 from 17 countries and the EC).
- Azerbaijan - $4,781,700 (€3.8 million) was donated in 2006 by two countries and the EC, an increase of approximately 17 percent from 2005 ($4,100,776 from three countries).
- Bosnia and Herzegovina - $18,764,851 (€14.9 million) was donated in 2006 by 14 countries and the EC in 2006, an increase of 23 percent from 2005 ($15.3 million from 15 countries). Burundi - $2,987,894 (€2.4 million) was donated in 2006 by three countries and the EC, an increase of 32 percent from 2005 ($2,270,595 from three countries and the EC).
- Cambodia - $29,583,031 (€23.5 million) was donated in 2006 by 13 countries and the EC, an increase of 24 percent from 2005 ($23.9 million from 14 countries).
- Chad - $2,384,274 (€1.9 million) was donated in 2006 by two countries, roughly a 103 percent increase from 2005 ($1,169,000 from the United States).
- Chechnya - $1,334,902 (€1.1 million) was donated in 2006 by six countries and the EC, an increase of 36 percent from 2005 ($982,124 from three countries).
- Chile - $2,333,923 (€1.9 million) was donated in 2006 by five countries and the EC, an increase of 137 percent from 2005 ($985,849 from three countries).
- Colombia - $4,336,602 (€3.5 million) was donated in 2006 by six countries and the EC, an increase of 86 percent from 2005 ($2,332,300 from seven countries and the EC).
- Croatia - $6,543,964 (€5.2 million) was donated by nine countries in 2006, a decrease of 31 percent from 2005 ($9,491,287 from eight countries and the EC).
- Cyprus - $1,256,300 (€1 million) was contributed by the EC in 2006; the EC previously donated €5 million in multiyear funding from 2004 to 2006.
- DR Congo - $5,109,463 (€4.1 million) was donated in 2006 by seven countries and the EC, an increase of five percent from 2005 ($4,864,770 from eight countries and the EC).
- Ethiopia - $7,859,540 (€6.3 million) was donated in 2006 by five countries and the EC, an increase of some 200 percent from 2005 ($2,604,980 from six countries).
- Iraq - $35,288,325 (€28.1 million) was donated by 14 countries in 2006, an increase of some 27 percent from 2005 ($27.8 million from 14 countries).
- Jordan - $6,475,440 (€5.2 million) was donated in 2006 by 10 countries, an increase of 342 percent from 2005 ($1,464,826 from three countries and the EC).
- Kosovo - $2,007,518 (€1.6 million) was donated in 2006 by four countries and the EC, an increase of six percent from 2005 ($1,895,252 from six countries).
- Laos - $13,383,570 (€10.7 million) was donated in 2006 by nine countries and the EC, an increase of 85 percent from 2005 ($7,231,485 from 10 countries).
- Lebanon - $68,845,935 (€54.8 million) was donated in 2006 for emergency and other mine action in Lebanon in 2006 by 20 countries and the EC, compared to $6.3 million provided by six countries and other funding channels in 2005.
- Mozambique - $6,219,923 (€5 million) was donated in 2006 by nine countries and the EC, a decrease of 38 percent from 2005 (some $10 million from 12 countries).
- Nicaragua - $5,722,481 (€4.6 million) was donated in 2006 by six countries, an increase of 64 percent from 2005 ($3,499,295 from six countries).
- Somalia - $1,738,143 (€1.4 million) was donated in 2006 by two countries and the EC, compared to $110,000 donated by one country in 2005.
- Somaliland - $2,931,329 (€2.3 million) was donated in 2006 by seven countries and the EC, a decrease of 21 percent from 2005 ($3,729,030 from six countries).
- Sri Lanka - $9,932,574 (€7.9 million) was donated in 2006 by eight countries and the EC, a decrease of 48 percent from 2005 ($19,045,929 from 10 countries and the EC).
- Sudan - $28,934,082 (€23 million) was donated in 2006 by 12 countries and the EC, a 38 percent decrease from 2005 ($46,914,250 from 14 countries and the EC), largely accounted for by the drop in Japan’s funding in 2006 after a significant contribution in 2005.
- Tajikistan - $1,064,785 (€847,556) was donated in 2006 by four countries, an increase of 15 percent from 2005 ($924,168 from three countries and the EC).
- Uganda - $1,666,251 (€1.3 million) was donated in 2006 by four countries in 2006, a small decrease from 2005 ($1,763,449 from five countries).
- Vietnam - $8,256,167 (€6.6 million) was donated in 2006 by six countries, an increase of 44 percent from 2005 ($5,736,918 from six countries).
- Yemen - $4,072,155 (€3.2 million) was donated in 2006 by four countries and the EC, a 66 percent increase from 2005 ($2,458,864 from six countries).
[1] Mine action funding for Lebanon accounted for some 64 percent of the overall increase in global funding in 2006.
[2] Sweden has allocated greater amounts in the past; 2006 marks the greatest reported disbursement of funds.
[3] Email from Zach Hudson, Program Director, Adopt-A-Minefield; email from Andrew Cooper, Programme and Policy Officer, The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund, 28 August 2007; email from Laura Kelch, Development Assistant, LSN, 28 August 2007. Some funds raised by Adopt-A-Minefield in 2006 were disbursed in early 2007.
[4] UNMAS, “Annual Report 2006,” New York, pp. 66, 68.
[5] Contact Group on Linking Mine Action and Development, “Purpose and focus of the Contact Group,” undated, pp. 1-3, www.gichd.org. OECD = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
[6] Statement by Canada, Standing Committee on General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 23 April 2007; email from Carly Volkes, Program Officer, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, 22 August 2007.
[7] Statements by ICBL and the EC, Standing Committee on General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 23 April 2007.
[8] UNMAS, “Annual Report 2006,” New York, p. 64.
[9] Email from Melissa Sabatier, Mine Action and Small Arms Unit, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, UNDP, 27 August 2007.
[10] Email from Conventional Arms Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 6 June 2007.
[11] ITF, “Annual Report 2006,” Ljubljana, pp. 8, pp. 18-21.
[12] Figures for the years prior to 2006 are taken from Landmine Monitor Report 2006, with any corrections received for earlier years. In most cases figures for earlier years are calculated at the exchange rates for those years.
[13] The 1992-2006 total includes contributions by some states for which amounts for specific years are not known, including $50 million from the UAE to Lebanon during 2002-2004.
[14] Revised from $376 million reported in Landmine Monitor Report 2006, based on revision of EC and Belgium 2005 funding totals. See EC and Belgium funding sections below for details.
[15] Revised from $399 million reported in Landmine Monitor Report 2006, based on revision of EC 2004 funding totals. See EC funding section below for details.
[16] Average exchange rates for 2006, used throughout this report; A$1 = US$0.7535, C$1 = US$0.8818, CZK1 = US$0.0443, DKK1 = US$0.1683, €1 = US$1.2563, ¥1 = US$0.0086, NZ$1 = US$0.6492, NOK1 = US$0.1560, SEK1 = US$0.1357, SIT1 = US$0.0052, CHF1 = US$0.7980, £1 = US$1.8434. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2007. SKK1 = US$0.0337 (SKK-EU exchange: European Central Bank Statistical Data Warehouse, Exchange rates, Bilateral, Annual). In lists of national funding following, amounts are given also in national currency except in cases where the donor reported in US$.
[17] The total of EC and EU member states’ funding in 2006 has been calculated by adding Landmine Monitor’s estimate of EC funding in 2006 (€68,417,090) to EU member states’ mine action funding provided bilaterally or otherwise than via the EC.
[18] World Bank, “Total GNI 2006, Atlas method,” World Development Indicators Database, 1 July 2007,
www.worldbank.org, accessed 11 July 2007. For EU member states, the calculation of mine action funding as a percentage of GNI is based solely on their reported contributions bilaterally or otherwise than via the EC; individual EU member states’ contributions to mine action via the EC has not been reported.
[19] Total US funding and recipients based on official US data; some variation in actual expenditure occurred. For fuller details on the summary information in this Introduction, see reports on individual countries in this edition of Landmine Monitor.
[20] Total collated from EC Budget line 19 02 04, “Community participation to actions relating to antipersonnel mines, Annual Work Plan 2006,” Version 15/13/2006, emails from EC delegations, and additional data provided by Antoine Gouzée de Harven, EuropeAid Co-operation Office, EC, 23 July 2007.
[21] The 2005 EC funding total has been reduced by €3 million (from the previous Landmine Monitor estimate based on information provided by Security Policy Unit, Conventional Disarmament, EC, June-July 2006). EC funding of €3 million for stockpile destruction in Belarus was terminated in November 2006. Letter to Landmine Monitor from Hélène Chraye, Head of Operations, EC Delegation to Ukraine and Belarus, 12 July 2007.
[22] The 2004 EC funding total has been reduced by €5.91 million (from the previous Landmine Monitor estimate based on information provided by RELEX Unit 3a Security Policy, EC, 19 July 2005). EC funding of €5.91 million for stockpile destruction in Ukraine was terminated in April 2007. Letter to Landmine Monitor from Hélène Chraye, EC Delegation to Ukraine and Belarus, 12 July 2007.
[23] The European Commission reported a 2005 funding total of €54.15 million (EC, “The European Union Mine Actions in the World 2006,” Luxembourg, p. 88). Landmine Monitor has not adopted this total because it includes funding allocated prior to 2005, funding allocated but not disbursed, and R&D funding which is calculated separately by Landmine Monitor.
[24] Email from Yngvild Berggrav, Advisor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 8 August 2007. Norway’s 2007 Article 7 report quoted $37,042,000 in mine action funding for 2006, however, a breakdown of funding items was not provided in the report.
[25] Email from Conventional Arms Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 6 June 2007.
[26] Email from Andy Willson, Program Officer, Department for International Development (DfID), 23 February 2007.
[27] Includes amounts from 1993 to 1996, reported on the basis of calendar year, and for fiscal year 1997-98.
[28] Figures prior to 1998 only include CIDA funding.
[29] Email from Carly Volkes, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, 5 June 2007.
[30] Includes amounts for 1989 and 1993-97.
[31] Email from Carly Volkes, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, 22 August 2007.
[32] Germany Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2007.
[33] Figures prior to 1996 are not available.
[34] Email from Vincent van Zeijst, Deputy Head, Arms Control and Arms Export Policy Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 11 July 2007.
[35] Email from Sven Malmberg, Minister, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 27 August 2007.
[36] Email from Jacob Bang Jeppesen, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 26 February 2007
[37] Email from Rémy Friedmann, Political Division IV, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 7 June 2007.
[38] Email from Rémy Friedmann, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 22 August 2007.
[39] Emails from Catherine Gill, Mine Action Coordinator, AUSAID, 10 July and 10 September 2007.
[40] Includes fiscal years from 1995-1996 to 1997-1998.
[41] Email from Catherine Gill, AUSAID, 19 August 2007.
[42] Mine Action Investments Database, accessed 21 March 2007.
[43] Email from Manfredo Capozza, Humanitarian Demining Advisor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 23 August 2007.
[44] Email from Sirpa Loikkanen, Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 23 February 2007.
[45] Belgium Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2007.
[46] The 2005 Belgium funding total has been increased by €2 million from previous Landmine Monitor estimates. Belgium provided €2 million to ICRC in 2005, not previously reported by Landmine Monitor. Email from Michel Peetermans, Head of Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, Federal Public Service for Foreign Affairs, 7 September 2007.
[47] Differentiated amounts for 1994-1997 are not available.
[48] Email from Anne Villeneuve, Advocacy Officer, Handicap International, Lyon, 12 July 2007; with information from Béatrice Ravanel, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Henry Zipper de Fabiani, Commission Nationale pour l’Elimination des Mines Anti-personnel (CNEMA).
[49] Differentiated amounts for 1995-1997 are not available.
[50] Slovakia Article 7 Report, Form J, undated but 2007; email from Henrik Markus, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 August 2007.
[51] Differentiated amounts for 1996-97 are not available.
[52] Email from Michael Keaveney, Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, Department of Foreign Affairs, 20 July 2007.
[53] Differentiated amounts for 1994-97 are not available.
[54] Austria Article 7 Report, Form J, undated but 2007.
[55] Differentiated amounts for 1994-97 are not available.
[56] Email from Alexander Kmentt, Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 4 May 2006.
[57] Email from Aaron Davy, Multilateral Development Programme Administrator, NZAID, 11 July 2007.
[58] Total includes fiscal years from 1992-1993 to 1997-1998.
[59] Spain Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2007. Email from Luis Gómez Nogueira, Sub-department for International Disarmament, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Co-operation, 22 August 2007.
[60] Email from Patricia Ababio, Finance Associate, UNDP, 23 May 2007.
[61] Email from Michel Leesch, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 24 July 2007.
[62] Email from Irina Gorsic, Counsellor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 March 2007.
[63] Response to Landmine Monitor from the Permanent Mission of the ROK to the UN in New York, 16 April 2007.
[64] Email from Jan Kara, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 29 May 2007.
[65] Austria Article 7 Report, Form J, undated but 2007.
[66] Email from Carly Volkes, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, 5 June 2007.
[67] Email from Kitagawa Yasuhiro, Japan Campaign to Ban Landmines, 14 June 2007; email from Conventional Arms Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 6 June 2007. Japan’s bilateral contribution to Cambodia for mine-clearance equipment R&D was included in Cambodia’s 2006 recipient funding total.
[68] Email from Andy Willson, DfID, 23 February 2007.
[69] US Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), “Department of Defense Budget Fiscal Year 2008, RDT&E PROGRAMS (R-1),” February 2007, p. D-8; USG Historical Chart containing data for FY 2006, by email from Angela L. Jeffries, Financial Management Specialist, US Department of State, 20 July 2007.
[70] Total annual funding to Afghanistan prior to 2006 is based on reporting from UNMACA/MAPA. The 2006 total is based on funding identified by Landmine Monitor.
[71] By US$ value of contributions to specific countries in each region and regional funding to the OAS for mine action in the Americas and to the ITF for mine action in Europe and the CIS.
[72] Late-year allocations by the EC, pending disbursement in 2007, account for much of the reported increase to Afghanistan and did not offset funding shortages during 2006; see recipient details for Afghanistan following.
[73] The ITF reported allocating $176,182 to Montenegro and $2.6 million to Serbia in 2006, from various donors.
[74] Countries receiving more than $1 million overall and more than a $1 million increase in 2006 from 2005.